Before the cut Lewis was getting hammered
Collapse
-
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight(!)
OK, so how am I a "hater"? You're going to have describe the word 'hater' for me, because the only active boxers (off the top of my head) for whom I genuinely have a disliking are the following:
Chagaev, Valuev, Maskaev, Ibragimov, Valero. Why? Because I think they're ****.
But as you can see from that list, however, there's not a Klitschko in sight. By full admission I'm no fan of Vitali, but not for one moment does that make me "hate" him. In case you didn't know (and it's highly likely, given your presumptuous and borderline ******ed manner of posting), there is actually such a thing as not liking a boxer on the basis of finding them stylistically unappealing.
Do you understand that? Can you fathom the simple reasoning behind what I've written? It's like how Pacquiao once said - "It's nothing personal". I just don't like Vitali because of how he fights. It's not my thing. But does that make me "hate" him? Absolutely not. I think he's a sound individual outside of the ring, and conducts himself very well as a champion. I also think it's a real credit to the sport as to how he always turns up in tip-top shape for fights (although his stamina leaves a lot to be desired).
As for his brother, I don't think I need to repeat once again that I've openly claimed my spot as a fan around these parts. I think he's an excellent fighter and a true champion. I find his style very cool to watch, and like bigger bro he's a gentleman outside of the ring. The brothers are great ambassadors to the sport. But I'm also objective, in that I don't go spouting off crap about how he'd beat anyone in the history of boxing, or that he's unbeatable to the max. That's being what's called a "stan". Conversely, a "fan" acknowledges faults in his favourite fighter(s) and discusses them objectively.
To conclude, then, where is the "hate"? Show me a post where I've displayed this so-called "hate" for Vitali. I'd love to hear your definition of such a strong and oft-misused word.Comment
-
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight(!)
OK, so how am I a "hater"? You're going to have describe the word 'hater' for me, because the only active boxers (off the top of my head) for whom I genuinely have a disliking are the following:
Chagaev, Valuev, Maskaev, Ibragimov, Valero. Why? Because I think they're ****.
But as you can see from that list, however, there's not a Klitschko in sight. By full admission I'm no fan of Vitali, but not for one moment does that make me "hate" him. In case you didn't know (and it's highly likely, given your presumptuous and borderline ******ed manner of posting), there is actually such a thing as not liking a boxer on the basis of finding them stylistically unappealing.
Do you understand that? Can you fathom the simple reasoning behind what I've written? It's like how Pacquiao once said - "It's nothing personal". I just don't like Vitali because of how he fights. It's not my thing. But does that make me "hate" him? Absolutely not. I think he's a sound individual outside of the ring, and conducts himself very well as a champion. I also think it's a real credit to the sport as to how he always turns up in tip-top shape for fights (although his stamina leaves a lot to be desired).
As for his brother, I don't think I need to repeat once again that I've openly claimed my spot as a fan around these parts. I think he's an excellent fighter and a true champion. I find his style very cool to watch, and like bigger bro he's a gentleman outside of the ring. The brothers are great ambassadors to the sport. But I'm also objective, in that I don't go spouting off crap about how he'd beat anyone in the history of boxing, or that he's unbeatable to the max. That's being what's called a "stan". Conversely, a "fan" acknowledges faults in his favourite fighter(s) and discusses them objectively.
To conclude, then, where is the "hate"? Show me a post where I've displayed this so-called "hate" for Vitali. I'd love to hear your definition of such a strong and oft-misused word.
All I see is I'm a hater.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Of course not I'm not claiming any crazy conspiracy theories but the fact is Lewis may have butted Vitali before or after the cut that made it worse, he hit him dozens of times with kidney shots infront of an incompetent ref, and then he leaned on him like he did to Tyson to try to take out his legs. Lewis fought with heart but he sure as **** bent the rules alot to get that win.Comment
-
Comment
-
Of course not I'm not claiming any crazy conspiracy theories but the fact is Lewis may have butted Vitali before or after the cut that made it worse, he hit him dozens of times with kidney shots infront of an incompetent ref, and then he leaned on him like he did to Tyson to try to take out his legs. Lewis fought with heart but he sure as **** bent the rules alot to get that win.Comment
-
lewis is a slow starter and vitali took advantage. not uncommon and doesnt mean jack ****. lewis figured him out and by the time the fighht was over the one who got his ass beat was vitali.
can u please explain to me why winning the first two rounds of a 12 round fight against a notoriously slow starter is so damn impressive?Comment
Comment