IF Pac won against Cotto. whose Loss is more Embarrassing? Cotto Or ODLH

[boojee]

Let's just say Pac won against Cotto. in your opinion whose loss (against Pac) is more embarrassing, Oscar or Cotto?

[KILLA RIGHT]

Depends how cotto losses but i doubt it will be as bad as oscar

[Rorschach™]

Oscar's loss..he is a bigger star than cotto and also he's the bigger man..people are expecting him to beat the hell out of pac but it was the other way around..

[WhoreUs]

Depends how cotto losses but i doubt it will be as bad as oscar

oscar has a reason why he lost.

fighting in a division he hasn't fought in for many years.

he was past prime and getting old.

he lost the weight in a bad manner.

many reasons.



cotto has no reason to lose to a featherweight built fighter.

aside from "HE JUST WASN'T THAT GOOD."

[MANGLER]

Nobody knew goin into the DLH fight that DLH would be so weak. He cherrypicked a LW to duck Marg, and got ****d n retired for his trouble.

Cotto coulda rematched SSM or Clottey, but went for the $ in a catchweight fight wit a lil guy, then bitched about puttin up his belt.

Both losses are terrible. Cotto's could be a lil worse just cuz of what Tua said.

[larry smith]

oscar has a reason why he lost.

fighting in a division he hasn't fought in for many years.

he was past prime and getting old.

he lost the weight in a bad manner.

many reasons.



cotto has no reason to lose to a featherweight built fighter.

aside from "HE JUST WASN'T THAT GOOD."

uhhhhhh last time i checke manny is the favorite.. it is actually manny that got no reason to lose.. yeah cotto is bigger but manny is better and i hope he doesnt disappoint his fans

[WhoreUs]

uhhhhhh last time i checke manny is the favorite.. it is actually manny that got no reason to lose.. yeah cotto is bigger but manny is better and i hope he doesnt disappoint his fans

pacquiao is the betting favorite.

he's more known and has more fans.



this fight should be 50-50 or even cotto ahead because he's so much bigger and stronger.

obviously manny is a much superior fighter to cotto but size does mean something.

[larry smith]

pacquiao is the betting favorite.

he's more known and has more fans.



this fight should be 50-50 or even cotto ahead because he's so much bigger and stronger.

obviously manny is a much superior fighter to cotto but size does mean something.

yeah the point is whoever is the favorite, usually it's more "embarassing" for that guy to lose.. in this case, it's manny.. not cotto..

manny has more pressure to win than cotto..

manny got more to lose here than cotto..if he lose it proves team pacman were way over their heads, pacman cant beat a legit WW

[WhoreUs]

yeah the point is whoever is the favorite, usually it's more "embarassing" for that guy to lose.. in this case, it's manny.. not cotto..

manny has more pressure to win than cotto..

manny got more to lose here than cotto..if he lose it proves team pacman was way over their head, pacman cant beat a legit WW

it's a lose-lose for michelle.

more than likely pacquiao will make him look ******.

and even if michelle wins......pacquiao is a natural featherweight. don't mean ****.

[rao007]

It's not size--they look comparable when one does a video comparsion-it's the power which seperates the two.