If Cotto loses to Pacquaio, Will he retire???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingChaos
    Ambiguous
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 4596
    • 311
    • 272
    • 11,182

    #51
    Originally posted by TredKiller
    do you think cotto will retire if he loses???????????

    poll coming
    If he loses to the little ninja who could, yes.. Cotto should retire.

    Comment

    • Talisayen
      Title User
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 13995
      • 5,216
      • 10,394
      • 976,564

      #52
      Originally posted by fdotorres
      "nuclear" theory is how people commonly call the atomic theory. thanks to einstein's, the US was able to develop nuclear bombs faster than germany (even though they started their research/development later)

      that's what i gave him credit for in the original discussion. feel free to look it up through my post history
      I'll try to bump up the thread that started the "nuclear theory" bull crap. Do you remember the title of the thread?

      The first posting on the nuclear theory is really very entertaining.

      Comment

      • KingTito
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 9391
        • 234
        • 350
        • 22,960

        #53
        No he's young. Pacquiao's the favorite and #1 p4p. Cotto still has a lot to offer boxing. He'll probably still have his belt anyway. He's too good and too popular.

        Comment

        • kadyo's
          Grand Son
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 23628
          • 2,648
          • 3,802
          • 56,474

          #54
          Originally posted by KingTito
          No he's young. Pacquiao's the favorite and #1 p4p. Cotto still has a lot to offer boxing. He'll probably still have his belt anyway. He's too good and too popular.
          But do you think nuclear theory = atomic theory? What about hydrogen theory?

          Comment

          • Talisayen
            Title User
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 13995
            • 5,216
            • 10,394
            • 976,564

            #55
            Originally posted by kadyo
            nuclear theory = atomic theory = einstein's theory? e=mc^2?
            That's the theory of Relativity. that's the correct term that einstein developed.

            Comment

            • Talisayen
              Title User
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 13995
              • 5,216
              • 10,394
              • 976,564

              #56
              Originally posted by kadyo
              But do you think nuclear theory = atomic theory? What about hydrogen theory?

              LOL fdotorres is a comedian trying to be the next einstein.

              Comment

              • kadyo's
                Grand Son
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2004
                • 23628
                • 2,648
                • 3,802
                • 56,474

                #57
                Originally posted by Talisayen
                That's the theory of Relativity. that's the correct term that einstein developed.
                Is it in the special relativity theory or in the general relativity theor?. Maybe torres can enlighten me.

                Comment

                • Elie
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 2037
                  • 71
                  • 13
                  • 2,469

                  #58
                  Originally posted by fdotorres
                  nuclear theory = atomic theory = einstein's theory sent in a letter no USA's president

                  shall i posts a couple of links about it?

                  btw, you still haven't answered my question about the bet i have with you. you asked me to put it in my sig, so why isn't it in yours?

                  Einstein stated on the 20th of September 1952
                  "My part in producing the atomic bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to Theodore Roosevelt, pressing the need for experiments on a large scale in order to explore the possibilities for the production of an atomic bomb."

                  A. Einstein "On the Abolition of the Threat of War", Ideas and Opinions, Crown, New York, (1954) page 165.



                  A single act of scribbling his name on a piece of paper.

                  Comment

                  • kadyo's
                    Grand Son
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 23628
                    • 2,648
                    • 3,802
                    • 56,474

                    #59
                    Originally posted by CottoFanatic
                    Einstein stated on the 20th of September 1952
                    "My part in producing the atomic bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to Theodore Roosevelt, pressing the need for experiments on a large scale in order to explore the possibilities for the production of an atomic bomb."

                    A. Einstein "On the Abolition of the Threat of War", Ideas and Opinions, Crown, New York, (1954) page 165.



                    A single act of scribbling his name on a piece of paper.
                    Einstein was a humble man.

                    Comment

                    • Talisayen
                      Title User
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 13995
                      • 5,216
                      • 10,394
                      • 976,564

                      #60
                      Originally posted by kadyo
                      Einstein was a humble man.
                      If i remember fdotorres mentioned in one of his intellectual post that einstein is an emotional person just like him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP