Winky Wright puts nate Campbell to shame.

[Swoosh]

He knew that right away huh?

LOL...

I guess Nate is a doctor and a ****ty fighter.

Who knew?

Yes and if you weren't so ignorant, you'd know how he knew that right away.

Do you fight, Jack?

[bojangles1987]

Winky is a cool guy but one of the most boring fighters of all time. I'm not sure what you mean by Winky taking full advantage of his chance. Winky never did make it to superstardom.

He finally got a big fight against Shane Mosley, and won. Then he won the rematch. This led to an even bigger fight against Trinidad, where he destroyed Tito. He was able to get fights and become a star he never would have been because of these fights. You think Bernard Hopkins or Jermain Taylor would have given a tough fighter like Winky a fight unless he wasn't a star? You think Trinidad would have bothered with Winky Wright unless he had earned newfound stardom against Shane Mosley?

[JACK D. RIPPER]

Yes and if you weren't so ignorant, you'd know how he knew that right away.

Do you fight, Jack?

I know that Israel Vazquez fought Rafa with a detached retina for 12 rounds in one of the best fights of all time.

What does me fighting have anything to do with Nate quitting?

[bojangles1987]

I know that Israel Vazquez fought Rafa with a detached retina for 12 rounds in one of the best fights of all time.

What does me fighting have anything to do with Nate quitting?

And in the first fight Vazquez fought like 3 rounds unable to breathe because his nose was very visibly out of alignment.

[Swoosh]

And in the first fight Vazquez fought like 3 rounds unable to breathe because his nose was very visibly out of alignment.

And quit...and lost.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

And quit...and lost.

After giving it everything he had.

Unlike Nate who bitched out right away.

Vazquez and Campbell don't even belong in the same sentence.

[Swoosh]

I know that Israel Vazquez fought Rafa with a detached retina for 12 rounds in one of the best fights of all time.

What does me fighting have anything to do with Nate quitting?

I was just curious as to where your knowledge begins and ends with boxing. You seem to just post things in order to get a rise out of people without really posting with any substance.

If you knew what it was to step in the ring, then i would say that you had every right to call someone a quitter. There's no doubt that Nate quit, but to label the man a quitter for circumstances which were out of his control, is childish.

[bojangles1987]

And quit...and lost.

At least he gave it a shot. I have more respect for that. Nate gave up as soon as the head butt happened. He decided to bank on an unsure no contest and yell at the ref for the 3rd round rather than fight.

Nate said after the fight he is the only fighter that never complains about decisions. Are you kidding me? All he does is complain about everything. When Peden knocked his dumbass out he complained about that.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

I was just curious as to where your knowledge begins and ends with boxing. You seem to just post things in order to get a rise out of people without really posting with any substance.

If you knew what it was to step in the ring, then i would say that you had every right to call someone a quitter. There's no doubt that Nate quit, but to label the man a quitter for circumstances which were out of his control, is childish.

I don't need to be a professional fighter to label him a quitter.

I've watched enough fights to know the difference.

By your standards, we cant criticize the president either, since we've never been president, lol.

Nice try dumbass.

[crillz]

Nate Campbell should realize he is a 5 loss fighter going against an undefeated star in the making and he is going to catch no breaks. When a chance like the fight against Bradley comes up you don't just give in expecting the no contest, even if you are right. You have to EARN superstardom, not expect it to be given to you.

hard work and determination will always prevail, you could have more than 10 losses and if you've fought your way into a shot you'll get it, don't talk to me about his losses as a reason why he should have taken such a ****** risk. right there and then he could have stepped out of the fight without a TKO loss and that was the point of it all, he had ALL the right and reasons to and it should have happened..

you talking about Bradley like Bradley is the only big fight Nate will ever get man and that's banana's, Nate has to lose his next few to be in such a tight spot as you're making it out to seem he is in.

Nate gave it his all, the cut ****ed with him and due to blurred vision he knew he couldn't see, with a cut like that and a guy punching as fast as Bradley there is no question you take the No Decision, it's simple, whether or not you like or dislike his choice is up to you, 100% opinion but the only FACT here is that Nate was 100% right and you can talk all the **** you want but you would have done it too.

it's foolish to imply Nate is anything less than a ****ing warrior man, in and out the ring too yo you are TRIPPIN..