I just watched Cotto-Urkal fight again

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rob6465
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 1850
    • 36
    • 1
    • 8,362

    #41
    Originally posted by JM1
    yes bro. pacs footwork is better than miguel
    You are right and Cotto's jab, power, experience with bigger fighters is better than pacman's. We can dissect both fighters but we need to remember what weight class fighters these 2 have been fighting. Big difference. Morales vs Clottey, Barrera vs mosley, Hatton vs Mosley, etc, etc

    Comment

    • rob6465
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 1850
      • 36
      • 1
      • 8,362

      #42
      Originally posted by JM1
      ill surely will bro. lots of people here thinks i did a wrong thing by reviewing cottos fight with urkal when my only intention was to spot some weaknesses and was able to see a lot that pac can take advantage of
      No, you are not wrong. Watching Cotto fights is good in that he has only lost 1 fight and yes he has gotten in trouble but all we need to do is look at the end result. Cotto vs Urkal? Final Result? Cotto vs Judah? Final result? Cotto has only lost 1 time and after the suspension we need to be wary of any Margarito win? It's like Alex Rodriguez/David Ortiz/Manny Ramirez. Can you be 100% sure they did NOT use steroids in 2005? 2006? We can't but we can assume they did because of them cheating.

      Comment

      • JM1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 6655
        • 684
        • 529
        • 15,193

        #43
        Originally posted by rob6465
        You are right and Cotto's jab, power, experience with bigger fighters is better than pacman's. We can dissect both fighters but we need to remember what weight class fighters these 2 have been fighting. Big difference. Morales vs Clottey, Barrera vs mosley, Hatton vs Mosley, etc, etc
        good post. yes cottos jab is definitely better than pac. though i think theres not much difference in terms of the power department. keep posting bro, ill give you a green K as soon as i can
        Last edited by JM1; 08-04-2009, 08:49 AM.

        Comment

        • oc9979
          Bad Intentions
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 7192
          • 304
          • 226
          • 14,354

          #44
          you watching an old fight to see flaws. you have to watch recent fights. He improved since then

          Comment

          • JM1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 6655
            • 684
            • 529
            • 15,193

            #45
            Originally posted by rob6465
            No, you are not wrong. Watching Cotto fights is good in that he has only lost 1 fight and yes he has gotten in trouble but all we need to do is look at the end result. Cotto vs Urkal? Final Result? Cotto vs Judah? Final result? Cotto has only lost 1 time and after the suspension we need to be wary of any Margarito win? It's like Alex Rodriguez/David Ortiz/Manny Ramirez. Can you be 100% sure they did NOT use steroids in 2005? 2006? We can't but we can assume they did because of them cheating.
            i definitely know the end results of those fights bro since ive watched it before and im just watching it again. im just doing a review to spot some of miguels weaknesses

            Comment

            • JM1
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 6655
              • 684
              • 529
              • 15,193

              #46
              Originally posted by oc9979
              you watching an old fight to see flaws. you have to watch recent fights. He improved since then
              read the first page, my reviews doesnt stop here ill be watching more. thanks for posting

              Comment

              • rob6465
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 1850
                • 36
                • 1
                • 8,362

                #47
                Originally posted by JM1
                good post. yes cottos jab is definitely better than pac. though i think theres not much in terms of the power department. keep posting bro, ill give you a green K as soon as i can
                I like Pacman as i like Marquez and think these 2 fighters are very, very good fighters. The difference between them 2 and cotto is the weight class. Until Cotto beats Pacman or Marquez we cannot say he is better than either fighter. Between JMM and pacman i still feel JMM beat Pacquiao in 2nd fight.

                Comment

                • JM1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 6655
                  • 684
                  • 529
                  • 15,193

                  #48
                  Originally posted by rob6465
                  I like Pacman as i like Marquez and think these 2 fighters are very, very good fighters. The difference between them 2 and cotto is the weight class. Until Cotto beats Pacman or Marquez we cannot say he is better than either fighter. Between JMM and pacman i still feel JMM beat Pacquiao in 2nd fight.
                  lets just wait and see how he does at welter. about pacs second fight with jmm, thats a very close fight and either could have won
                  Last edited by JM1; 08-04-2009, 08:56 AM.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP