Does Nate Campbell deserve a rematch?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ianblake
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 3677
    • 935
    • 626
    • 10,263

    #21
    yes he deserve a rematch ... Bradley landed like 3 clean punches or less in 3 rounds and yes a headbutt

    Comment

    • Swoosh
      Contender
      • Jul 2008
      • 272
      • 11
      • 8
      • 6,339

      #22
      Originally posted by Bigdaddy_Vh
      why should nate get a reward for being a *****? this is why our sport has such a bad name...fighters get paid WAY too much and do nothing for it. Nate had a standard cut over his eye...big ****ing deal. Sure it was a headbutt, but thats the nature of the game and he knows it. He took the ***** route and got ****ed for it. His fault, his loss.
      Why do you think they put rules in place for accidental fouls before 4 rounds? So that they aren't followed?

      If Bradley is a man, he'll fight again because he knows he did nothing to win. Gary Shaw is the scumbag of all scumbags and everything he touches turns to ****.

      Comment

      • onedream722
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 3565
        • 108
        • 43
        • 4,469

        #23
        Originally posted by Swoosh
        Why do you think they put rules in place for accidental fouls before 4 rounds? So that they aren't followed?

        If Bradley is a man, he'll fight again because he knows he did nothing to win. Gary Shaw is the scumbag of all scumbags and everything he touches turns to ****.
        yeah shaw is a mother fcuker...dude was put on blast and looked like an idiot..."if the money is right" thats whats wrong with boxing...that fight was just heating up and the replay clearly showed a headbutt...

        Comment

        • DiegoFuego
          Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2005
          • 17338
          • 1,403
          • 586
          • 24,657

          #24
          Quitters do not deserve a rematch

          Comment

          • tnf1400
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 156
            • 14
            • 41
            • 7,867

            #25
            To be honest, I dont want to see Nate Cambell fight again. Ive only watched a few of his fights and I was disapointed every time, with the exception of the Daiz fight. The ridiculous and very unprofessional fight with Peden. The bullcrap he pulled after the lose to Hlatshwayo. The boring performance against Funeka. Maybe im being alittle harsh but i dont see Nate as a Showtime/Hbo fighter, he sould stick to espn and verses.

            If Daiz gets by Paulie, he sould rematch Nate to prove that the first fight was a fluke.

            Comment

            • !! Shawn
              !! Shown
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 9810
              • 670
              • 724
              • 31,455

              #26
              Originally posted by texanballer
              What do you all think? If Tim Bradley can find better fights for more money i think he should go that route. I dont think Campbell deserves to get a rematch. If he dug deep and fought with that cut and then the doctor stopped the fight, i would say he deserves every right for a rematch.

              However instead of being a fighter and fighting on he decided to quit and avoid fighting through some adversity. Now personally i dont think he did it because he felt he was losing, i think it was close and he knew fighting with one eye he probably would not get the job done.

              Also i understand the danger of blood flowing in the eye. But this is boxing where cuts happen. There have been tons of boxers tried to fight on with much worse cuts than last night. Arturo Gatti would be spinning in his grave if he was already laid to rest right now, since quitting was not in his dictionary.

              p.s, Campbell refusing to continue in my opinion proved how much a factor that horrendous cut Juan Diaz had affected his performance and the overall fight.
              I like you, youre a good kid, but you really need to read up on the facts. The fight was not stopped because of the cut. The fight was stopped because the doctor saw signs suggestive of a torn retina.

              Comment

              • !! Shawn
                !! Shown
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9810
                • 670
                • 724
                • 31,455

                #27
                Originally posted by Swoosh
                Why do you think they put rules in place for accidental fouls before 4 rounds? So that they aren't followed?

                If Bradley is a man, he'll fight again because he knows he did nothing to win. Gary Shaw is the scumbag of all scumbags and everything he touches turns to ****.
                Its really quite astonishing. There are all these people that are mad because Nate didn't lie to the man there to protect his health. Its absolutely ridiculous. If the doctor felt Nate could have continued, he would have let the fight go on regardless of what Nate said.

                Comment

                • boxing2106
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 2640
                  • 71
                  • 44
                  • 8,937

                  #28
                  thier should be a rematch to shut nate up... but then agian its pointless... just liike bradley sed.. nates to heavy footed nd was getting older by the round.. nate was gonna get out worked..

                  Comment

                  • VatoMulatto
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 8168
                    • 289
                    • 218
                    • 104,445

                    #29
                    Campbell didn't even try to continue. Tim took his heart in that third round and Campbell decided to quit.

                    Comment

                    • S.G.
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 9412
                      • 296
                      • 635
                      • 16,360

                      #30
                      Originally posted by CottoOverrated1
                      well bradley has a ton of options right now not named pacman and hatton. you got the winner of diaz vs malinaggi. lamont peterson is his mandatory. Devon Alexander. Nate Campbell rematch(will happen if showtime wants it and easy money). Marcos Maidaina. Guzman. Marquez(if he loses to mayweather). All those fights could happen. 140 is loaded with names to fight. Lets not act like nate campbell is this big name.
                      Juan Diaz is the only name worth choosing over a Campbell rematch of those mentioned

                      I think a fight against Marquez is unlikely. He has bigger fish to fry over the next year or so

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP