-
-
Huh? Actually, and this is one thing that annoys me about the fact that everyone is bagging him for saying he couldn't see, and that is that in the second Peden fight, the rematch to the KO, Campbell's eyes got so busted up that he looked like Klitschko vs Lewis and yet he fought on nearly winning until the doctor stopped it while Campbell desperately wanted to go on because he could still see fine.
This has happened to him all throughout his career until that where it was pretty damn obvious that he was having genuine trouble with his vision and spots impairing it. So, for those that think he was just backing out for no reason try understanding his whole career first. He was blinded in one eye and it was possible to still get a ND so he could fight on next time with two eyes. Unless he has retinal damage.Comment
-
That's rubbish. The doctor asked "Can you see?" and Nate said "No, I can't see", and "I'm seeing spots". The doctor never said "Are you seeing spots?" before Nate ever said anything. Stop making stuff up mate.
God, this is getting really out of hand. If this was anyone else that had said "I'm seeing spots" and "I can't see", most people here would be fine with it, being able to look at it for what it is. Simply having a bad impairment and stopping it. Why don't you guys understand that this is his job. Just like you guys go to the office or whatever, he fights professionally and needs to be able to keep doing it for as long as he can to support his family etc etc. If this happened to you and your eye was ****ed and you could get the NC because of a busted up eye from a headbutt then you would of course take it to fight properly next time. Too many ****** people here.Comment
-
The difference was the cut in Diaz's eye didn't become evident until the 6th round. The difference in this fight was that there was a massive cut that was evident by the end of the 3rd round. The referee should of done his job and he wasn't. This should be ruled a NC since the cut was obviously bothering Nate. And Campbell said Bradley's puches weren't hurting him. Campbell has been through worse adverseity than this, I doubt he was in anyway scared of losing, not to mention the fight was heating up by the 3rd, don't be a ***** and doubt Nate's fighting spirit. There will be a rematch.Last edited by Boxingwizard; 08-03-2009, 08:21 AM.Comment
-
my post fight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUxjniyUMHc they need to appeal hopefully it happens, what next for CampbellComment
-
got someone to reply lol. i looked at the fight over again and would i agree that the fight should of been a no contest but i am still glad it wasnt. Nate was straight up lying, and as a liar myself, we can spot eachother. He was searching his mind for the right words and thats why it came out akward in the corner with the doctor. Hell the Doctor didnt even believe him. Everyone here can blast my comments but when his results come in and Campbell does not have a Detached Retna i will give you all the Middle finger with my left hand. Oh wait a Don KIng Doctor will say you have a hole in your heart or were legally blind to make a Don King fighter who just lost look better.Comment
-
The whole point was that it was such an obvious headbutt and Campbell insisted that the ref called a headbutt ruling after it happened. Whatever happened, the ref was simply terrible and had no clue as to what was going on in there at all. No time out was taken even though right after it happened Campbell pointed to his eye and Bradley's head straight after the head clash as blood started spewing out of his eye and the ref just motioned them on as if nothing had happened. Very ****** ref. Frustrating. This is why they need instant replay for these things. Too many times a ref is too incompetent to call it right.Comment
-
**** that quitter...i hope his appeal gets trashed....Comment
Tweet
Comment