Campbell Camp Begins Appeal Process With CSAC

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GRUSTLER
    Undisputed champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 14118
    • 444
    • 115
    • 20,934

    #71
    Originally posted by PAC-BOY
    He saw good enough to walk around that ring and ***** and complain about the ruling. AND NEVER EVEN SQUINTED HIS EYE. AND IT STOPPED BLEEDING.LOL...
    The Word For Today...BACKFIRE !
    That's what I'm saying! Once they wiped the blood away,
    it never bled again even when he was running around the
    ring beefing. OK, so say he does get a NC decision, what
    does that mean? Same thing could happen in the rematch,
    Bottom line is, Nate can't beat Bradley. What's ironic is that
    for the first few rounds that the fight lasted, Nate was talking
    a lot of crap to Bradley and to quit, is like huh?

    Comment

    • GRUSTLER
      Undisputed champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 14118
      • 444
      • 115
      • 20,934

      #72
      Originally posted by voneric
      What are they trying to pull on us? I saw the part where Campbell was Crying about stopping the fight and i never saw the Dr say that he saw blood. What i saw was Campbell do everything to stop that fight, even yell at his corner when they try to urge him to keep going. I heard Campbell say "He couldnt See" over and over again complaining about a Butt. It was only after the Doctor asked if he saw Spots did Campbell actually say those words. It was an Akward moment, like a Bad Lawyer leading his Witness, and none of it was very believeable. Campbell wasnt believeable about not being able to see and the Doctor wasnt believing a word Campbell was saying. Only after the Doctor realized Campbell was not going to continue did he Bring up the Mysterious SPots. I will go back and look on the DVR but if I am not mistaken the Doctor advised Campbell to go the Hospital only because he kept saying he was seeing Spots and just mentioned what could be wrong. I could be mistaken but i think we have a Case of Spinning the Story on our Hands. It serves Campbell right looking like a complete fool out there mainly because thats the exact way he was able to beat Juan Diaz. At least The Baby Bull was man enough not to Ruin Campbells night cause he was scared to take an AssWhupping like Campbell did to Bradley and the Post Fight was beyond words. In what should of been Bradleys proudest moment was turned into Campbell and King Yelling at Bradley for Him to Be a Man an admit it was a Butt. Well how about King And NateCampbell Man-Up and admit that he had no problems with his ability to See, oh i mean seeing spots. Campbell you just made sure you will never be Seen (no Pun Intended) on TV again unless as a stepping stone on FridayNightFights or Telemundo. Come to think of it, thats where you belong anyway.
      I agree with you 100%. Just looked like Campbell wanted the fight
      to be stopped, nobody else in his corner was buying it.

      Comment

      • GRUSTLER
        Undisputed champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 14118
        • 444
        • 115
        • 20,934

        #73
        Originally posted by Swoosh
        I still don't understand why anyone thinks Nate was getting hit. It wasn't until the last part of the 3rd round that Nate took a hard punch.

        Timmy looked stronger then Nate, but he definitely wasn't punching harder, nor did he land many clean punches.
        Nate Campbell lost all 3 rounds.

        Comment

        • GRUSTLER
          Undisputed champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 14118
          • 444
          • 115
          • 20,934

          #74
          Originally posted by Swoosh
          You should probably watch a replay of the fight. Might i suggest in slow motion so you can see what's really going on this time.
          So if Bradley never landed anything significant how come he
          took all 3 rounds from Campbell? I saw a different fight. Bradley
          was connecting and frustrating Campbell.

          Comment

          • Swoosh
            Contender
            • Jul 2008
            • 272
            • 11
            • 8
            • 6,339

            #75
            Originally posted by jbin333
            ----------------------
            and what exactly did nate do? he couldnt even touch bradley!!!
            So you're saying that because Nate didn't appear to be hitting Bradley that Bradley must have been hitting Nate?

            This is like a bad secret being told. Everyone just keeps reading each others post and adding to them. First it was "Bradley was winning" and now it's "Bradley was destroying him!!!"

            Truth is, up until the butt, it was a pretty even fight. Campbell as the aggressor in round one won him the round IMO. Tim won the second. But even after the butt, Timmy threw a big flurry of punches but nothing landed. Nate went on to land some big body shots and Timmy finally caught him with a decent shot late in the round.

            If Timmy doesn't rematch Nate, he will be considered the real quitter. The same type of thing happened when De La Hoya reopened a cut that Chavez had before their first fight. Oscar missed a jab but the outside of his glove caught Chavez in the existing cut. Blood went everywhere and Chavez lost by TKO. Oscar took that win and ran like a ***** and wouldn't give Chavez a rematch for 2 1/2 years. Just long enough to let Chavez get a wee bit older.

            Oh yeah, Chavez quit in that fight too. Does that mean that people on here call him a quitter too?

            Comment

            • GRUSTLER
              Undisputed champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 14118
              • 444
              • 115
              • 20,934

              #76
              Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
              The bottom lne is that Campbellq quitted. And if you quit you deserve to lose regardless of rules and ****.!!!!!!!!!
              Is that the same way you feel about Miguel Cotto in terms of
              Margarito?

              Comment

              • GRUSTLER
                Undisputed champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 14118
                • 444
                • 115
                • 20,934

                #77
                Originally posted by Swoosh
                So you're saying that because Nate didn't appear to be hitting Bradley that Bradley must have been hitting Nate?

                This is like a bad secret being told. Everyone just keeps reading each others post and adding to them. First it was "Bradley was winning" and now it's "Bradley was destroying him!!!"

                Truth is, up until the butt, it was a pretty even fight. Campbell as the aggressor in round one won him the round IMO. Tim won the second. But even after the butt, Timmy threw a big flurry of punches but nothing landed. Nate went on to land some big body shots and Timmy finally caught him with a decent shot late in the round.

                If Timmy doesn't rematch Nate, he will be considered the real quitter. The same type of thing happened when De La Hoya reopened a cut that Chavez had before their first fight. Oscar missed a jab but the outside of his glove caught Chavez in the existing cut. Blood went everywhere and Chavez lost by TKO. Oscar took that win and ran like a ***** and wouldn't give Chavez a rematch for 2 1/2 years. Just long enough to let Chavez get a wee bit older.

                Oh yeah, Chavez quit in that fight too. Does that mean that people on here call him a quitter too?
                I hear you bruh, but I watched the fight and Bradley was
                beating Nate Campbell and bringing the fight to Nate and
                won all 3 rounds.

                Comment

                • Swoosh
                  Contender
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 272
                  • 11
                  • 8
                  • 6,339

                  #78

                  Comment

                  • daggum
                    All time great
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 43415
                    • 4,538
                    • 3
                    • 166,270

                    #79
                    campbell didn't let his corner work on the cut for even 1 second. he already came back to the corner demanding the fight be stopped. i think he knew he wasn't gonna win and didn't wanna be there anymore. there is a difference between unable to continue and unwilling to continue. campbell didn't let the corner or doctor actually look at him he just started screaming for the fight to be stopped. the doctor is always gonna stop it if the fighter throws a hissy fit saying he cant see just like judah did when he got a tiny cut.

                    Comment

                    • Swoosh
                      Contender
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 272
                      • 11
                      • 8
                      • 6,339

                      #80
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      campbell didn't let his corner work on the cut for even 1 second. he already came back to the corner demanding the fight be stopped. i think he knew he wasn't gonna win and didn't wanna be there anymore. there is a difference between unable to continue and unwilling to continue. campbell didn't let the corner or doctor actually look at him he just started screaming for the fight to be stopped. the doctor is always gonna stop it if the fighter throws a hissy fit saying he cant see just like judah did when he got a tiny cut.
                      The cut wasn't the issue. Vision was. Cutmen don't work on vision.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP