Bradley Stops Campbell After Three, Retains Title

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lcheezy
    Banned
    • Nov 2006
    • 1568
    • 63
    • 0
    • 1,665

    #91
    either way its looked at it was a head butt and should be a no contest.

    Comment

    • Crazylegs77
      null and void
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 13101
      • 445
      • 296
      • 21,573

      #92
      Would Jesus have ruled it a NC?

      Bradley should ask himself this question. After praising the allmighty lord for delivering a TKO unto him. One would think he followed his teachings.

      Tell the truth unless if it is not in your favor?!

      Comment

      • Crazylegs77
        null and void
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 13101
        • 445
        • 296
        • 21,573

        #93
        Would Jesus have ruled it a NC?

        Bradley should ask himself this question. After praising the allmighty lord for delivering a TKO unto him. One would think he followed his teachings.

        Tell the truth unless if it is not in your favor?!
        Last edited by Crazylegs77; 08-01-2009, 10:41 PM. Reason: duplicate

        Comment

        • naz786
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 83
          • 2
          • 0
          • 6,257

          #94
          Am I the only one who feels Campbell has a point?

          Dedicated boxing fan here from the UK, sitting here at 4.26am having watched local boy Witter quit on the stool and then Nate Campbell hard done by. It is the end of the road for Witter surely. I was fuming when he quit. Re the 2nd fight, why is everyone so anti-Campbell. Look at the footage of the fight, there was a clear clash of heads in the round and that led to the cut. The referee was spouting rubbish because under the rules, its a NC and Bradley didn't hit Campbell to cause the cut. Campbell made good noise about it and he was right to do so. I know he was losing the fight and on the backfoot but it should have been a NC!!!

          Enough of the rant. I'm blogging and twittering on boxing regularly @ www.sportscene.tk

          PEACE!!!

          Comment

          • naz786
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 83
            • 2
            • 0
            • 6,257

            #95
            Am I the only one who feels Campbell has a point?

            Dedicated boxing fan here from the UK, sitting here at 4.26am having watched local boy Witter quit on the stool and then Nate Campbell hard done by. It is the end of the road for Witter surely. I was fuming when he quit. Re the 2nd fight, why is everyone so anti-Campbell. Look at the footage of the fight, there was a clear clash of heads in the round and that led to the cut. The referee was spouting rubbish because under the rules, its a NC and Bradley didn't hit Campbell to cause the cut. Campbell made good noise about it and he was right to do so. I know he was losing the fight and on the backfoot but it should have been a NC!!!

            Enough of the rant. I'm blogging and twittering on boxing regularly @ www.sportscene.tk

            PEACE!!!

            Comment

            • Equinox
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2009
              • 1319
              • 118
              • 22
              • 7,528

              #96
              kind of, i mean lets be honest, he should have a nc on his record.

              Comment

              • Equinox
                Undisputed Champion
                • Mar 2009
                • 1319
                • 118
                • 22
                • 7,528

                #97
                timothy bradlye is the real deal, i see him being able to sweep his division.

                Comment

                • Sutekh uvdabrix
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 1718
                  • 47
                  • 0
                  • 7,935

                  #98
                  Should be a a rematch in november


                  end of story

                  Comment

                  • Crazylegs77
                    null and void
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 13101
                    • 445
                    • 296
                    • 21,573

                    #99
                    Originally posted by naz786
                    Dedicated boxing fan here from the UK, sitting here at 4.26am having watched local boy Witter quit on the stool and then Nate Campbell hard done by. It is the end of the road for Witter surely. I was fuming when he quit. Re the 2nd fight, why is everyone so anti-Campbell. Look at the footage of the fight, there was a clear clash of heads in the round and that led to the cut. The referee was spouting rubbish because under the rules, its a NC and Bradley didn't hit Campbell to cause the cut. Campbell made good noise about it and he was right to do so. I know he was losing the fight and on the backfoot but it should have been a NC!!!

                    Enough of the rant. I'm blogging and twittering on boxing regularly @ www.sportscene.tk

                    PEACE!!!
                    I dont know how anyone who saw fight and the replay couldnt come to any other decision than a NC.

                    Comment

                    • chinoy
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 1104
                      • 326
                      • 350
                      • 7,909

                      #100
                      Cong**** to Bradley although most analysts predicted he would win.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP