Why did the WBC strip Bradley again?

[street bully]

He was willing to pay both sanctioning fees, and keep boht straps. They let Pavlik keep both, but why not Bradley?

[larry x]

for some reason in order to let the fight with holt happen in the first place..bradley had to agree to choose which belt he would defend after the fight.....****** ass ****..he eanred both of those belts..and the winner of witter and whoever the **** will just be a paprer chanp..this is what hurts this beloved sport..real champs getting stripped...and paper champs being crowned

[King Koopa]

I believe they wanted him to fight Devon Alexander

[The Hammer]

He was willing to pay both sanctioning fees, and keep boht straps. They let Pavlik keep both, but why not Bradley?

They've been flexible with Pavlik, Forrest and Mayweather in the past, but not with Bradley.

It doesn't make sense, really.

[catalinul]

I believe they wanted him to fight Devon Alexander

False.He said many times he would fight him.

The WBC have been extremely ******ed with the situation.They basically didn't want him to have 2 belts and made him choose one.

The mando had nothing to do with it.

[Ray*]

He was suppose to fight his mandatory in Devon 3 different time and didnt and he was rightly stripped...I applaud the WBC for that, The problem is the WBC let the better name to get away with stuff like that, Remember when Vitali Klits held up the WBC ranking for about 2 years with injuries and the WBC refuse to strip him???