Tweet
Along the same lines, is it just me or is Jim Lampley ungodly bias? I mean bad. It seems that he heavily favors certain fighters over others. I randomly think of DLH/Mosley II (which I scored for DLH). Mosley could do nothing right at all. Particularly in the ninth, Mosley did very well, but Lampley would hear none of it (or saw none of it). General observations??
-
-
yeah, he sees close fights as pretty one sided, depending on whose in it, but i've sort of got used to the guy -
Most broadcasters are biased. Lampley is not by any means alone in his biased coverage.Comment
-
He has a talent of putting things into words but he's as biased as teh next fan. Sometimes he just flat out dont make any sense.Comment
-
thats why they need boxers to help anylize. foreman always used to correct or atleast disagree with lampley. from what ive seen jones will do that as wellComment
-
Originally posted by Duncan
i ****in love lampley, he kicks assComment
-
I think he knows how to hugs the balls of a boxer he likes really good. He knows how to say the right stuff to make you just want to be a fan of a person he talks about.Comment
-
I have no problem with Lampley. He's good at what he does, sometimes his emotion taints his judgement, but overall he calls a good fight and has good catch phrases. "Here comes Morales, here comes Barrera." etc...Comment
-
lampley is good at hightening the situation. he creates drama. its far better than colonel fattyComment
-
I do agree that he injects a lot of emotion into his commentary that really adds to the experience. Sometimes though, he gets a little saucy.... "look at the glistening body of a warrior," etc. Makes one feel a little uncomfortable....Originally posted by oldgringoComment
to your mom..
Comment