Fresh from the Hopkins vs Eastman fight and here we are divided into 2 groups. We have those looking for a satisfying slugfest win from the fighters in the left and posters content with a tactical win on the right. Where should compliments for a chess match of a fight start and where does the overrated craving for a win through a war end? I think Bhop did what he had to do regerdless of how he did it. He's still a winner reaching #20.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Comment