Why isn't Arreola complaining about his contract with Vitali?

[The Hammer]

Arreola vs. Vitali is signed for 26th of September.

http://www.ringtv.com/blog/933/v_klitschko_arreola_reach_deal/

Negotiations were done very quickly. Arreola is no mandatory, just like Haye wasn't.

How is it possible that Arreola is not whining and complaining about how unfair, greedy and terrible the Klitschkos are to do business with? How come this Arreola guy is more than happy to climb into the ring as soon as possible with a true world champion and become an instant superstar overnight?

This is a slap in Haye's face and shows what kind of a de****able, immature character he is, talking this nonsense about "bad contracts" and "greedy Klitschkos".

Haye and Adam Booth are responsible for the fiasco, nobody else. The Klitschkos would be wise to never try and do business with that childish man and his amateurish management again.

[Phirsole]

Should Haye defeat Valuev, it would be nice to see one of the Klitschkos meet Haye in the ring. It would mean at least two belts get united - one way or the other. And it would be a fight the audience wants to see.

Not that I see Haye win easily against Valuev. He might win by points, but I doubt we'll hear the call "timber" in the arena. Interesting fight, nonetheless.

[MARKBNLV]

Haye is all talk beat some one besides barrett

[Lucky Charms]

It's obviously not the same contract. HBO will pay a lot more money for this fight because it involves an American, and the fight is in Arreola's home country.

[Heru]

Klitscko's hate Arreola and treat him accordingly, they've been in negotiations with Arreola before so they probably had something drawn out that they both like.

I'm 100% sure that Goossen isn't going to accept a 3 fight option on Arreola. Not only that, but he was only gonna get Setanta IOU's or Sky ppv buy money while getting ****ed out of the HBO money when he was a huge reason they were buying it (see Chavgaev) and Wlad and him sold 50000 tickets in less than a week. Wlad's never sold that before, these things have to be taken into account.

What Haye did was a ***** move, but he was getting r**** so I don't blame him. He should have never took the fights in the first place though.

[The Hammer]

It's obviously not the same contract. HBO will pay a lot more money for this fight because it involves an American, and the fight is in Arreola's home country.

It obviously IS a similar contract. The difference is Arreola is a warrior, Haye is a chicken-hearted fraud.

Arreola has a following in Southern California and so the fight will be sold out, while in England, Haye has only his little band of delusional hayemosexuals.

Haye's last fight in London drew only 5000 - 6000 in a venue that holds over 18,000.

[The Hammer]

I'm 100% sure that Goossen isn't going to accept a 3 fight option on Arreola. Not only that, but he was only gonna get Setanta IOU's or Sky ppv buy money while getting ****ed out of the HBO money when he was a huge reason they were buying it (see Chavgaev) and Wlad and him sold 50000 tickets in less than a week. Wlad's never sold that before, these things have to be taken into account.

What Haye did was a ***** move, but he was getting r**** so I don't blame him. He should have never took the fights in the first place though.

There was no 3 fight option in Haye's contract!

In Haye's contract, there was ONE rematch (if Haye won) and ONE option for a fight promoted by K-2 (win or lose). Very standard stuff for a voluntary defense! Haye was LYING about it, to cover the real reason he backed out.

Those tickets sold because of Wlad, all his fights sell out in Germany[/B]. That's why they moved it to Germany, remember? Haye had 6000 in a venue that seats 18,000 for his last fight, Nov 08 in England.

There is the standard voluntary defense rematch clause in Arreola's contract, so if he win's he will rematch Vitali.

[Phirsole]

Queloque, I disagree.

Haye called out to the K brothers in 2008 for a fight. Big mouth with bad T-shirts. And, despite only a single HW fight, he received a title shot in June against Wlad, which was more than generous. So Haye signed a contract with a Klitschko, no matter the terms.

After he pulled out of the fight with Wladimir, Haye was offered another title shot (more than generous) against Vitali. And Haye didn't sign the contract but preferred Valuev instead. I can't see any unfairness on the Klitschko's side, even if the contract terms were worse than the first one (which I doubt).

Even if the contracts of the K brothers are not very friendly for the contractor, they still offer the chance for three of the four HW belts within three fights, and the dethroning of the RING-belt-holder. And the possibility to have defeated the No 1&2 of HW, BOTH Klitschkos. Is this bad?

If you manage to defeat both Klitschkos, you will be in the position to forge your own contracts afterwards. Just do it, and make yourself a name by deeds, not words! And Arreola is doing that (at least, he tries), so I have more respect for him than I'll ever have for Haye, after the stunts he pulled.

I cannot understand Haye or Valuev, who both had chances to fight one of the Klitschkos, and are now calling "NO FAIR" to the Ukrainians.

[Ray*]

Because they dont fear Arreola the same way they fear Haye, The thing is Haye actually use his mouth to either scare the Klits into drawing up a ridiculous contract with double brothers rematch just to safeguard their belts or he must have pissed them off with his mouth sooo much that they would draw up a ridiculous contract for him to sign.

the thing is for sure though Goosen would never get Arreola to sign a ridiculous contract to fight either of the Klits, So Vitali would have NO choice but to give in to goosen just to save face.

[Ray*]

Queloque, I disagree.

Haye called out to the K brothers in 2008 for a fight. Big mouth with bad T-shirts. And, despite only a single HW fight, he received a title shot in June against Wlad, which was more than generous. So Haye signed a contract with a Klitschko, no matter the terms.

After he pulled out of the fight with Wladimir, Haye was offered another title shot (more than generous) against Vitali. And Haye didn't sign the contract but preferred Valuev instead. I can't see any unfairness on the Klitschko's side, even if the contract terms were worse than the first one (which I doubt).

Even if the contracts of the K brothers are not very friendly for the contractor, they still offer the chance for three of the four HW belts within three fights, and the dethroning of the RING-belt-holder. And the possibility to have defeated the No 1&2 of HW, BOTH Klitschkos. Is this bad?

If you manage to defeat both Klitschkos, you will be in the position to forge your own contracts afterwards. Just do it, and make yourself a name by deeds, not words! And Arreola is doing that (at least, he tries), so I have more respect for him than I'll ever have for Haye, after the stunts he pulled.

I cannot understand Haye or Valuev, who both had chances to fight one of the Klitschkos, and are now calling "NO FAIR" to the Ukrainians.

Haye also brings that "Mouth" to the table, The same "mouth" that made alot of people sit up and pay the Klits some attention.. The facts are the Klits are no different to Don king who likes to protect his belts like his own personal property......When was the last time Wlad or Vitali sold 60,000 all seated stadium without dropping Haye's name in it??