What should be considered when classifying boxers as ATG's?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • D-Omonist
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 2969
    • 90
    • 103
    • 9,427

    #1

    What should be considered when classifying boxers as ATG's?

    Is there a real process for this!? What are the procedures? Where is the official list? Should PPV numbers be considered? Does winning most of your fights, but loosing your major ones qualify the boxer? Explain...
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #2
    Who they fought, what they won, how good they were at their peak, and the overall impact they had on boxing. PPV numbers are part of a fighter's impact on the sport, if a fighter consistently puts up Oscar like numbers and has the entire boxing world on notice, that is a factor.

    Comment

    • MANGLER
      Sex Tape Flop Artist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 30142
      • 1,705
      • 2,355
      • 46,598

      #3
      I view ATG as whether or not a fighter leaves a lastin legacy of accomplishments. Will he still be talked about for what he achieved yrs after he's gone. Was he not just gr8 amongst the guys who had their careers at the same time he did, but can he be compared to other gr8s of past eras. Not would he have beaten em or not, but can he match what they did in their career runs.

      Comment

      • D-Omonist
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 2969
        • 90
        • 103
        • 9,427

        #4
        Originally posted by bojangles1987
        Who they fought, what they won, how good they were at their peak, and the overall impact they had on boxing. PPV numbers are part of a fighter's impact on the sport, if a fighter consistently puts up Oscar like numbers and has the entire boxing world on notice, that is a factor.
        You may have a point with the entire boxing world noticing a fighter. Sort of like the media attention Ali had going on, but this shouldn't be considered. I mean at least Ali had the wins to back it up. There are some fighters that have the media's attention and really haven't beaten top competitors to earn themselves ATG status.

        Comment

        • D-Omonist
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 2969
          • 90
          • 103
          • 9,427

          #5
          Originally posted by mangler
          I view ATG as whether or not a fighter leaves a lastin legacy of accomplishments. Will he still be talked about for what he achieved yrs after he's gone. Was he not just gr8 amongst the guys who had their careers at the same time he did, but can he be compared to other gr8s of past eras. Not would he have beaten em or not, but can he match what they did in their career runs.
          Good post! Makes sense!!!

          Comment

          • mcentepede
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 94
            • 4
            • 0
            • 6,147

            #6
            Partly agreed. International appeal is a factor. Manny Pacquaio has this. Exciting style is a factor. Arturo Gatti had this, Pacqio also. PPv numbers is a bonus factor. Hoya mastered this.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP