If Pacquiao ever faced the winner of Bradley/Campbell....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • One Two
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 232
    • 54
    • 7
    • 706

    #11
    motherfuuucking thread starter is ****** as fuuck or just ****** hater. dude would u rather watch pacquiao fight this nobody than a pac-mayweather showdown? come on please be a little bit smarter. dumbass.

    Comment

    • JM1
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 6655
      • 684
      • 529
      • 15,193

      #12
      Originally posted by egreezy
      why do you think he went straight into a hatton fight without tuneups at that weight, but didn't do so @135? a bigger guy with 3 belts when the reward was there? campbell and bradley both beat hatton.
      diaz is a tuneup, no arguments bout that. but why fight campbell at 135 when he can fight oscar? and why fight bradley at 140 when he can fight the lineal champ in that division, ricky hatton?

      Comment

      • manok uli
        Thank You Ma'am
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 5019
        • 66
        • 2
        • 11,544

        #13
        Originally posted by One Two
        motherfuuucking thread starter is ****** as fuuck or just ****** hater. dude would u rather watch pacquiao fight this nobody than a pac-mayweather showdown? come on please be a little bit smarter. dumbass.

        YOU SUCK. Its a hypothetical question... Do you know what that means IDIOT?

        Comment

        • egreezy
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 3602
          • 250
          • 498
          • 10,101

          #14
          Originally posted by JM1
          diaz is a tuneup, no arguments bout that. but why fight campbell at 135 when he can fight oscar? and why fight bradley at 140 when he can fight the lineal champ in that division, ricky hatton?
          of course im just saying saying he made the jump to 140 for hatton w/.out tuneup because he is a less skilled fighter than campbell.

          Comment

          • JM1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 6655
            • 684
            • 529
            • 15,193

            #15
            Originally posted by egreezy
            of course im just saying saying he made the jump to 140 for hatton w/.out tuneup because he is a less skilled fighter than campbell.
            wrong. he had a tuneup against diaz to see if he can compete at a higher division and not because campbell is a threat. even after the diaz fight, they said on the post-fight interview that theyre willing to fight ricky at 140. try again

            Comment

            • vercingetorix3
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 1581
              • 73
              • 152
              • 8,356

              #16
              Originally posted by One Two
              motherfuuucking thread starter is ****** as fuuck or just ****** hater. dude would u rather watch pacquiao fight this nobody than a pac-mayweather showdown? come on please be a little bit smarter. dumbass.
              I heart name-calling without thinking.

              As panickinu correctly pointed out, I was speaking in hypothetical terms (like if *****'s economic policies regarding both the supply of money and credit and the role of the Federal Reserve involved Austrian Economics rather than Keynesian thinking).

              But you're right, I'm probably "just ****** hater", which is why I have Manny Pacquiao listed under Favorite Fighters in my signature.

              And for the record, I'd rather see Pacman/PBF.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP