Nate Campbell under-rated?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #11
    Originally posted by chicano79us
    That's why Pac went after Diaz instead of Campbell at 135 right?? Cause he's overrated??
    Originally posted by cosmichorn
    next hot ****? No one talks about him, even though he was practically the undisputed LW champ, and like poster above said why did pac avoid his ass?

    when did this become a PAC discussion? that's how you gauge a guy on how he's rated? based on whether PAC fought him or not?


    i'm talkin about Nate Campbell....he beat Juan Diaz...he's lost Peden twice, and to Casamayor...i dont see what the big deal is...really, i dont...it wont surprise me when Bradley reminds everyone that Nate's nothin but B-level fighter who got lucky he cut Baby Bull

    Comment

    • billionaire
      Banned
      • Jul 2008
      • 1930
      • 160
      • 90
      • 2,411

      #12
      watch the castlemayor fight, looked like a tie to me.......campbell always starts out good but fades in all his losses....i think he will beat bradley because he has no power....

      Comment

      • The_Demon
        Big dog
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 13604
        • 1,354
        • 888
        • 22,971

        #13
        not over/under rated i feel he gets the props he deserves
        will be a tough test for bradley i think he will take it though

        Comment

        • Mr. Fantastic
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 19036
          • 527
          • 1,328
          • 20,027

          #14
          Originally posted by Makavelli
          when did this become a PAC discussion? that's how you gauge a guy on how he's rated? based on whether PAC fought him or not?


          i'm talkin about Nate Campbell....he beat Juan Diaz...he's lost Peden twice, and to Casamayor...i dont see what the big deal is...really, i dont...it wont surprise me when Bradley reminds everyone that Nate's nothin but B-level fighter who got lucky he cut Baby Bull
          No one is claiming Campbell is a ATG or the most feared guy. Losing to Casamayor isn't a big deal either. A B-level fighter doesn't win 3 belts in a division.

          It wasn't just the cut that made Baby Bull lose. And this is coming from a big Juan Diaz fan. No version of Diaz would of beaten Campbell that night.

          If he loses to Bradley, it isn't a big deal either. Bradley is the ****.

          Comment

          • catalinul
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 6581
            • 115
            • 49
            • 13,580

            #15
            Originally posted by billionaire
            watch the castlemayor fight, looked like a tie to me.......campbell always starts out good but fades in all his losses....i think he will beat bradley because he has no power....
            Bradley has decent power.

            Nothing lower than Campbell's.

            Comment

            • TredKiller
              Not the Critic who Counts
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 4538
              • 183
              • 180
              • 11,853

              #16
              he's a throwback fighter that came up the hard way,
              win, lose or draw he comes to fight,

              whats not to like?

              Comment

              • -MAKAVELLI-
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 50080
                • 3,580
                • 2,792
                • 169,000

                #17
                Originally posted by chicano79us
                No one is claiming Campbell is a ATG or the most feared guy. Losing to Casamayor isn't a big deal either. A B-level fighter doesn't win 3 belts in a division.

                It wasn't just the cut that made Baby Bull lose. And this is coming from a big Juan Diaz fan. No version of Diaz would of beaten Campbell that night.

                If he loses to Bradley, it isn't a big deal either. Bradley is the ****.


                dont act like he beat 3 champs for those 3 belts...he beat one....one that has a tendency to wig out when he sees his own blood...what else has he prior to that? name all the major belts that he's held? IBO? NABO? USBA? NABF?

                Comment

                • -MAKAVELLI-
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 50080
                  • 3,580
                  • 2,792
                  • 169,000

                  #18
                  Originally posted by TredKiller
                  he's a throwback fighter that came up the hard way,
                  win, lose or draw he comes to fight,

                  whats not to like?


                  not sayin i dont like the guy...that 'throwback' style in doing it the hard way is what would make me root for nate in a fight...but when assesing his status, i just dont rate him as highly as everyone else does

                  Comment

                  • Mr. Fantastic
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 19036
                    • 527
                    • 1,328
                    • 20,027

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Makavelli
                    dont act like he beat 3 champs for those 3 belts...he beat one....one that has a tendency to wig out when he sees his own blood...what else has he prior to that? name all the major belts that he's held? IBO? NABO? USBA? NABF?
                    Well who's fault is it that one guy had 3 belts?? Not his at all. Like I said, I'm not claiming him to be great and all, but just a fighter who fights just about anyone.

                    You *******s just like to call him a b-level fighter to make the David Diaz fight seem like the real challenge at the time lol.

                    Comment

                    • Easy-E
                      Gotta want it
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22686
                      • 865
                      • 1,739
                      • 32,777

                      #20
                      Originally posted by cosmichorn
                      The guys had a tough road to world champ, and he finally got there and beat juan diaz a proven fighter, and then beat a tough maditory funeka despite mentally being all over the place due to not making weight.

                      I give him good chances against Bradley this weekend, its going to be a good fight, im surprised i havent seen more threads on it

                      No, he is not underrated, he is an underachiever. He has the skills and talent, but not the drive or work ethic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP