Honest Analysis of cotto vs pacman fight

[swizz]

good thread its going to be a great fight and let the best man win

[Pullcounter]

'
Determining Factor #3: NEVER SAY DIE: Both men are known around the boxing world as true warriors, but one fundamental difference between the two speaks volumes. Pacquiao has lost a few fights, but they were all either on his back or on the score cards. Miguel Cotto has only one loss of his career, but it came while standing on his own two feet. Some would raise health concerns, but in an era of combat sports where every man wants to establish himself as an 'ultimate fighter', to know that Cotto suffered his only pro loss while standing certainly removes the shine from an otherwise stellar career. Both men have taken part in some of the biggest stages of the sport in recent times, but when the bright lights of Vegas flash on and the media hype begins to swirl, how will each man react in their greatest moment of adversity? Common knowledge says neither one of these men will quit, but history tells us that stranger things have happened. Which man is more prone to weather a fierce storm when the going gets rough? I say this one is EVEN.

are you kidding me? cotto is a quitter!!!

[One Two]

cotto is a heavy hitter but let's not forgot hatton and odlh are both heavy hitters too. forget the dehydrated excuse on dela hoya, pac was just too fast and moving in and out that's why it was hard for dela hoya to catch up with a young fighter. with ricky hatton the problem is that he didn't have any defense at all. like the old saying u can't teach an old dog new tricks. but then again speed kills and add an all out assault on that too, that's what pacquiao brought to the ring for those two big fights and it worked. with cotto it would be the same thing. pacquiao never slows down and will be a hard target for cotto who is especially damaged and only good for 5 rounds.

[Bushidō]

to make a long story short, oscar and hatton aint cotto. this will be the first true test for pac since superfeatherweight. if pac wins it will be cuz of his speed and movement, but he wont ko cotto unless cotto doesnt come prepared. and if cotto wins it will be cuz of the fact he's the stronger man. his power, good left hook and jab will be the difference if he could time pac when he lunges in. cotto can ko pac unless pac is able to keep his distance and move from cotto efficiantly.

cotto always comes prepared...Cotto is my favorite boxer but I think Pacquiao's speed will allow him to get to Cotto.

[rob6465]

I'm talking about the size discrepancy between ODLH and Mayweather, nothing else.

ohhh, don't know about that. I know oscar is 5'10 and floys is 5'8

[rob6465]

cotto is a heavy hitter but let's not forgot hatton and odlh are both heavy hitters too. forget the dehydrated excuse on dela hoya, pac was just too fast and moving in and out that's why it was hard for dela hoya to catch up with a young fighter. with ricky hatton the problem is that he didn't have any defense at all. like the old saying u can't teach an old dog new tricks. but then again speed kills and add an all out assault on that too, that's what pacquiao brought to the ring for those two big fights and it worked. with cotto it would be the same thing. pacquiao never slows down and will be a hard target for cotto who is especially damaged and only good for 5 rounds.

Oscar was a statue that night and hatton is a bad overrated jr welter.

[Aracibo04]

cotto is a heavy hitter but let's not forgot hatton and odlh are both heavy hitters too. forget the dehydrated excuse on dela hoya, pac was just too fast and moving in and out that's why it was hard for dela hoya to catch up with a young fighter. with ricky hatton the problem is that he didn't have any defense at all. like the old saying u can't teach an old dog new tricks. but then again speed kills and add an all out assault on that too, that's what pacquiao brought to the ring for those two big fights and it worked. with cotto it would be the same thing. pacquiao never slows down and will be a hard target for cotto who is especially damaged and only good for 5 rounds.

The article stated that hatton and dlh are no cotto in other words cotto is way better than them in the opinion reporter..
I ask you.. do you think hatto and dhl are equal or better than cotto? Or is cotto better than them?

[Chuckguy]

cotto is a heavy hitter but let's not forgot hatton and odlh are both heavy hitters too. forget the dehydrated excuse on dela hoya, pac was just too fast and moving in and out that's why it was hard for dela hoya to catch up with a young fighter. with ricky hatton the problem is that he didn't have any defense at all. like the old saying u can't teach an old dog new tricks. but then again speed kills and add an all out assault on that too, that's what pacquiao brought to the ring for those two big fights and it worked. with cotto it would be the same thing. pacquiao never slows down and will be a hard target for cotto who is especially damaged and only good for 5 rounds.

you just owne d yourself bro.
Weight drained = lathargic i mean slow zombie-esque
no defense = paulie Malinaggie can knock out someone who just stands there and gets hit

Pac is a very good all around boxer but Cotto is no bum

Honestly
Its going to be a very good competitive fight
I have Cotto by brutal body shot KO 9

[rob6465]

The article stated that hatton and dlh are no cotto in other words cotto is way better than them in the opinion reporter..
I ask you.. do you think hatto and dhl are equal or better than cotto? Or is cotto better than them?

I think cotto is better than both right now but oscar has a better career than cotto.

[rob6465]

are you kidding me? cotto is a quitter!!!

Quitter who lives to fight another day vs an idiot who does not know when to quit and is a veggie. Hmmmmmm...quitter to box another day like cotto.