Timothy Bradley: Pacquiao is not the best fighter

[nujabes77]

Pointing out your rank ******ity reveals me to be bitter and self-loathing, mm-hmm. Incisive analysis.



You're the guy who posted this,


Enough said.





Uh, since when?

what i expected from an individual like you...



Man In Black "peeleft:

[MaYaN_SuN]

oooohhh.....which mayan warrior beat pac who did'nt get ktfo twice ?......pac's about to retire and the answer is still none...nada...zip...zero......so long mayan fan...

lol Sheeit, feastin on our older legends is the only way you lame kids could ever get somthin this important to cheer for. Forget Paq not gettin in the ring with a guy who's as fresh as he is with a set of hands though, forget all that. I mean they were already too scared of a 3rd fight with a slower and older Marquez

I'm still shocked they built up enough nerve to take on Cotto though. lol I honestly didn't want to say anything before, but I thought for sure they weren't serious about the fight and that they were gonna call it off due to weight or somthin. But they're actually goin through with it. If Paq get's manhandled, they're gonna be kickin themselves in the ass for leavin all those fights back at 130.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

not because you dont like boxers that talk **** does'nt mean you dont watch for boxing at all.......dont tell me you dont root for anyone....

I root for fighters.

But my emotions don't go haywire if a fighter I 'like' talks a little bit of professional smack about a fighter I 'really like'. Because I'm not a squealy little fangirl.



Cf. all those fairweather Calzaghe Stans up in arms because Carl Froch said a few meanies about their idol. Pathetic.

Or this little sac-fondler pacman777 suddenly taking less of a shine to Tim Bradley all because he (*gasp*) said he's the real top dog of the 140lb division. Also pathetic.




And of all the Stan groups in this forum, you Pacquiao ball-lickers watch the least boxing.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

what i expected from an individual like you...

Yeah, sure. You know me so well. You even pointed out that (nonexistant) long-standing Hatton allegiance of mine.

However, that puerile **** is exactly what I expected from you. It's been your stock in trade since you signed up.


One for one,

pacman777 performing his favorite duty, cleaning His Highness King Pacquiao's royal foreskin :*******:

[baracuda]

I root for fighters.

But my emotions don't go haywire if a fighter I 'like' talks a little bit of professional smack about a fighter I 'really like'. Because I'm not a squealy little fangirl.



Cf. all those fairweather Calzaghe Stans up in arms because Carl Froch said a few meanies about their idol. Pathetic.

Or this little sac-fondler pacman777 suddenly taking less of a shine to Tim Bradley all because he (*gasp*) said he's the real top dog of the 140lb division. Also pathetic.




And of all the Stan groups in this forum, you Pacquiao ball-lickers watch the least boxing.

whats wrong with not liking a boxer that talks ****...one thing i hate about floyd also......its a fair enough reason not to root for a fighter....

[PinoyZoi]

If the majority of the fans choice who wins the matches than your statement will be true:

-Juan Manuel Marquez won against Manny Pacquiao
-Clottey won against Cotto
-Castillo won against Mayweather

TOO BAD THE JUDGES CHOICES RIGHT? Stop comming with your BS

[nujabes77]

I root for fighters.

But my emotions don't go haywire if a fighter I 'like' talks a little bit of professional smack about a fighter I 'really like'. Because I'm not a squealy little fangirl.



Cf. all those fairweather Calzaghe Stans up in arms because Carl Froch said a few meanies about their idol. Pathetic.

Or this little sac-fondler pacman777 suddenly taking less of a shine to Tim Bradley all because he (*gasp*) said he's the real top dog of the 140lb division. Also pathetic.




And of all the Stan groups in this forum, you Pacquiao ball-lickers watch the least boxing.

let it go, dont be such an overeacting little ***** and go suck on this

[nujabes77]

Yeah, sure. You know me so well. You even pointed out that (nonexistant) long-standing Hatton allegiance of mine.

However, that puerile **** is exactly what I expected from you. It's been your stock in trade since you signed up.


One for one,

pacman777 performing his favorite duty, cleaning His Highness King Pacquiao's royal foreskin :*******:

*sighs*...



cry some more like the little ***** you are



and calling me a fangirl when you are a naseem fangirl yourself... what an irony

[hugh grant]

People keep making excuses why pac isnt the best. But Hatton didnt chop no wait and wasnt weakened.

Bradley, Pac is the best cos he keeps winning and dont know defeat. When he loses you can say told you so he wasnt the best. But until that happens keep it zipped. Or get in queue to fight him.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

whats wrong with not liking a boxer that talks ****...one thing i hate about also......its a fair enough reason not to root for a fighter....

You don't get it.

For some guys, talking **** is an essential tool of the trade. You noobs have been spoiled on Pacman, but not all fighters get to be that graceful and stoic. Fighters' roles choose them as much as vice versa, it's up to those fans with a wit of perception to see all the ballyhoo and hype for what it is and just concentrate on what the guys do between the ropes. That's where you see the real class, the real respect shown.

Pacman talks no **** and that's lovely. But I'm damned if I'm going to swear off a young, talented, gutty up and comer like Bradley because of comments like these. Fuck that, I'll commend him for them. Good kid.


I happen to feel the good men outnumber the bad in boxing, and many of those good men have talked a little smack in their time.
The fighters who never talk **** are far outnumbered by the ones who have talked some. If you weren't complete noobs or just abject Pacman ball-kissers, you'd know this already.




A poster on this forum who talks far worse ****, though -- like pacman777 -- is about amillion less times noble. Get me?