I woulda rather seen Pac fight the Bradley-Nate winner than a catchweight fight wit Cotto. Whoever wins mos def deserves a shot, but does anybody but Flawless think Pac wouldn't beat both their asses?
Timothy Bradley: Pacquiao is not the best fighter
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Holt isnt a slick boxer at all to me. Malignaggi has much faster hand speed and better movement. Yes his punches dont hurt at all but they're strong enough to freeze just about anyone in their tracks for a couple of seconds when strung together. Long enough to move out of the way and reset. With the exception of the most granite chinned fighters being able to walk right through malignaggi's punches of course. And i dont feel Bradley would be the exception.To me, Holt has the ability to be the better overall boxer than Malignaggi at this point, and he's the MUCH harder puncher.
If Holt isn't slick enough to beat Bradley, what makes you think Malignaggi could?
Not to mention that Hatton is all but done, while Bradley is a hungry, unbeaten prime fighter.
Hatton may be about to retire....but if he chooses to continue i say he not only has the chin but the strength to bully Bradley and possibly knock him out.Comment
-
Nothing in Pacquiao's last three fights tells us he would for sure beat Campbell or Bradley. They are different style of fighters.Comment
-
Comment
Comment