catchweights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MARKBNLV
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 17497
    • 789
    • 707
    • 27,868

    #1

    catchweights

    Catch weighs suck what is the point of divisions if you a ww fight at 147 if your a jr ww fight at 140,the boxing public does not want to see these meaningless exhibitions,or at least i dont.
  • AKATheMack
    Unreasonably Logical
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 11155
    • 430
    • 285
    • 19,179

    #2
    Originally posted by markbnlv
    Catch weighs suck what is the point of divisions if you a ww fight at 147 if your a jr ww fight at 140,the boxing public does not want to see these meaningless exhibitions,or at least i dont.
    I was wondering why the Cotto-Pac fight wasnt getting any publicity.

    Comment

    • shadeyfizzle
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 7448
      • 160
      • 43
      • 13,959

      #3
      Originally posted by markbnlv
      Catch weighs suck what is the point of divisions if you a ww fight at 147 if your a jr ww fight at 140,the boxing public does not want to see these meaningless exhibitions,or at least i dont.
      Do you feel that way about all catchweight fights?? or just 1 in particular because you are biased towards or against 1 of the fighters?

      Because Mayweather vs Marquez will be at 145. Just the same as Cotto vs Pacquiao.

      Juan Diaz vs Paulie Malignaggi will be at 138.

      Are you seriously going to NOT watch all 3 of those fights?

      Comment

      • MARKBNLV
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 17497
        • 789
        • 707
        • 27,868

        #4
        honestly i have few fighters i am true fans of ,i try to look at everyfight i can evenly even if my fav fighter is losing :bhop: ,i will give credit to the other fighter,i just think the catchweights water down the idea of having divisions in the first place.

        Comment

        • onedream722
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 3565
          • 108
          • 43
          • 4,469

          #5
          im not really a fan of catchweights either but at the same time they do allow fights to happen in cases where they normally wouldn't

          Comment

          • shadeyfizzle
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 7448
            • 160
            • 43
            • 13,959

            #6
            Originally posted by markbnlv
            honestly i have few fighters i am true fans of ,i try to look at everyfight i can evenly even if my fav fighter is losing :bhop: ,i will give credit to the other fighter,i just think the catchweights water down the idea of having divisions in the first place.
            Did you have a problem with it when Bhop fought Oscar delahoya at a catchweight?

            Comment

            • AKATheMack
              Unreasonably Logical
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2004
              • 11155
              • 430
              • 285
              • 19,179

              #7
              Originally posted by markbnlv
              honestly i have few fighters i am true fans of ,i try to look at everyfight i can evenly even if my fav fighter is losing :bhop: ,i will give credit to the other fighter,i just think the catchweights water down the idea of having divisions in the first place.
              That is true, but Id rather see Cotto-Pac at a catchweight than not see it at all.

              Comment

              • onedream722
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 3565
                • 108
                • 43
                • 4,469

                #8
                Originally posted by ReppinDubK
                That is true, but Id rather see Cotto-Pac at a catchweight than not see it at all.
                i agree....i like cotto a lot but i think that he should be fine at 145 and if he wasn't confident he wouldn't of made this fight!!! no excuses for weight

                Comment

                • aether
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 3337
                  • 93
                  • 59
                  • 3,672

                  #9
                  Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
                  Do you feel that way about all catchweight fights?? or just 1 in particular because you are biased towards or against 1 of the fighters?

                  Because Mayweather vs Marquez will be at 145. Just the same as Cotto vs Pacquiao.

                  Juan Diaz vs Paulie Malignaggi will be at 138.

                  Are you seriously going to NOT watch all 3 of those fights?
                  i was thinking the same thing...

                  floyd is fighting a guy two divisions below his at a catchweight, making his opponent go up 9-10 pounds.

                  pacquiao is fighting a guy one division above his at a catchweight, making his opponent go down 1-2 pounds.

                  yet people ***** more about pacquiao's move....

                  Comment

                  • mathed
                    molṑn labé
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 54551
                    • 2,742
                    • 2,984
                    • 224,675

                    #10
                    Originally posted by aether
                    i was thinking the same thing...

                    floyd is fighting a guy two divisions below his at a catchweight, making his opponent go up 9-10 pounds.

                    pacquiao is fighting a guy one division above his at a catchweight, making his opponent go down 1-2 pounds.

                    yet people ***** more about pacquiao's move....

                    Yup, I agree that Mayweather should be the one catching grief if any of the two are to catch any at all.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP