DAVID HAYE was not KLITSCHKO s SLAVE. So can you stop with that ...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LA BAD BOY
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 1069
    • 51
    • 124
    • 2,010

    #1

    DAVID HAYE was not KLITSCHKO s SLAVE. So can you stop with that ...

    crappppppppppppp

    HAYE is a biggest ***** of all time.
    HAYE said after he smash BARRET that he wants 2 KLITSCHKO.
    TWOOOOOOOOOOOOO KLITSCHKO in 2009.

    And what happend.
    Little bit.ch didnt want to sign a contract which says if he beats one
    KLITSCHKO then he needs to fight another one.


    So ******s can you stop with that SLAVE sh.t?
  • JACK D. RIPPER
    Banned
    • May 2009
    • 5156
    • 237
    • 91
    • 5,854

    #2
    I heard there was a provision in the rematch clause that said not only did Haye have to fight Vitaly, but he had to mow their lawns, pick cotton and cook for them wearing a "Haye is Gay" apron...all while referring to them as "massa"..

    True story.

    Comment

    • The Gully Gad
      Jeffery Hype
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 42711
      • 2,053
      • 2,263
      • 54,550

      #3
      Haye brought up the slave **** which was wrong cuz he wanted the brothers on side..
      But *** you Haye...

      Even though he made a smart move cuz that Hairy prick is a fight Haye could win
      and get a slice of the championship which obviously gives him a bargin tool when it comes to a contract with the Kilts again....


      But lets be real..He didnt have to want to come into the ring wearing a white robe and mask with Vlad burning the cross thats out of line a little..

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP