Cotto won't put world title on line against Pacquiao

[ThunderWolf]

Michael Marley
NY Boxing Examiner
July 22, 2009

Bob Arum wants the world to think, hook, line and sinker, that the Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto is a done deal.

Love that Bob, as Dan Goosen likes to say.

While I’m sure that come hell or high water, the bout will happen Nov. 14 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas as scheduled, there is some drama going on behind the scenes.

Here are some bothersome details which the Top Rank Top Dog may not appreciate a public airing of.

Not that I’m worried about my Uncle Roberto as I work for you, the reader, and not for him.

Promoters sometimes mix that up with fight scribes although I won’t name names now. You shills can look at the shill in the mirror.

I am mixing metaphors all over the place, I know, but there are flies in the ointment as to Pacman-Cotto.

They are:

1. The contracts are unsigned although there is verbal agreement on a majority of the vital issues.

2. Realizing that Pacquiao got “extra sugar” poured on to his financial package by Arum for conceding on the 145 pound limit, it is now Cotto that is demanding that Tio Roberto sweeten his pot.

3. Arum very much wants to include the historic seventh world title angle in the promotional package and milk it for all it’s worth.

4. Obviously, that can’t be done if Cotto does not put his WBO 147 pound title on the line and it is just a 12 round non-title bout.

5. Cotto’s lawyer, Gabriel Penagaricano Jr., has informed both Arum and WBO bossman Paco Valcarcel that Cotto has no desire to risk his belt against Pacman.

6. Penagaricano, whose father was a longtime WBC honcho and legal adviser, is in a bit of a conflict of interest as he is a WBC secretary himself, duly appointed by WBC kingpin Don Jose Sulaiman. (Note that Andre Berto is the WBC champion and Luis Collazo is the top contender so this may not be significant.)

7. It’s hard to believe Penagaricano Jr. would not be advocating what his client Cotto wants so wise heads see the holdup as just that, an unarmed holdup to squeeze extra money out of Arum.

8. Valcarcel, for his part, won’t talk now but sources inside the WBO tell me that Arum has twice told him Pacquaio is keen on battling for the belt.

9. Although Valcarcel is biting his lawyerly tongue for now, the same sources in San Juan tell me the situation, if not resolved soon, could lead to Manny being able to “win” the title against Cotto. What organization would not want a revenue producer like Pacquiao on their roster?

10. Bad possible news for Cotto, if he doesn’t agree to a title defense and pay sanctioning fees, is that he can beat Pacman in the ring and have his title vacated by the WBO regardless.

This telenovela is far from finished. Sensing an opening here, one of the lesser regarded and non Big Four (WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF) groups, particularly the several who have flexible kind of pay what you want sanctioning fees, might get involved if this impasse is not solved.

In the current (July) WBO rankings, Manny is the No. 1 contender ahead of just failed against Cotto Joshua Clottey.

From the WBO website, here are those rankings. Pickings are slim below Clottey.

---------------------------------------------------

World Boxing Organization July, 2009

WELTERWEIGHT
(147 lbs.)(66,8 kgs)
Title Name Country
Champ MIGUEL COTTO PR
Interim
1 Manny Pacquiao PHI
2 Joshua Clottey GHA
3 Antonin Decaire (NABO) CAN
4 Rafal Jackiewicz POL
5 Saul Alvarez MEX
6 Krzysztof Bienias (Int-Cont) POL
7 Kell Brook GB
8 Jesus Soto Karaas MEX
9 Vitaliy Demyanenko (Asia-Pacific) KAZ
10 Valeriy Brazhbik UKR
11 Diosbelys Hurtado (Latino) CUB
12 Mike Jones USA
13 Carlos L. Herrera (Latino Int.) ARG
14 Jan Zaveck SLO
15 Samuel Columban (Oriental) CAM

[Doctor_Tenma]

Cotto shouldn't put it on the line, Cotto hasn't had any say on anything and we're talking about the champion here. Pacquiao can't always have it his way, we're talking, the much bigger cut, 145 and on top of that, he wants Cotto's belt.

The least Pacquiao can do is allow Cotto to come in at the WW limit of 147.

[Sin City]

simply put no.. welterweight is from 140 to 147 NOT 140 to 145.
If Cotto isn't allowed to make his weight comfortably then the belt shouldn't be on the line.

[Sin City]

Cotto shouldn't put it on the line, Cotto hasn't had any say on anything and we're talking about the champion here. Pacquiao can't always have it his way, we're talking, the much bigger cut, 145 and on top of that, he wants Cotto's belt.

The least Pacquiao can do is allow Cotto to come in at the WW limit of 147.

true ****. nottin but truth.

[Mayweather Sr]

Cotto shouldn't put it on the line, Cotto hasn't had any say on anything and we're talking about the champion here. Pacquiao can't always have it his way, we're talking, the much bigger cut, 145 and on top of that, he wants Cotto's belt.

The least Pacquiao can do is allow Cotto to come in at the WW limit of 147.

Cotto is not even getting 40% of the purse and has to come down to 145. I don't think the title should on the line.

[ThunderWolf]

...Sensing an opening here, one of the lesser regarded and non Big Four (WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF) groups, particularly the several who have flexible kind of pay what you want sanctioning fees, might get involved if this impasse is not solved...

I have a strange feeling that the IBO will sanction this fight. Who could resist that kind of money? It`s just destined to have a crown regardless, hehe.

[Kinto]

Cotto should get more money for putting the title on the the line. Getting 35%, catch-weight and his title on the line is just not a fair deal.