so cotto and pac at 145 big payday

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RodBarker
    Banned
    • Mar 2006
    • 3857
    • 177
    • 0
    • 4,097

    #11
    Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
    Nope the belt aint on the line.

    Cotto said if they want the belt it has to be at full 147!!!!!!

    Sweet deal indeed!!!
    That sounds like bull**** to me , if a WC is beaten under the weight limit his title is gone , non title fights are always over the limit never under it .

    Comment

    • BOOMbip
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 2275
      • 132
      • 51
      • 8,735

      #12
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      cotto stans = floyd stans.
      Pullcounter = Recluse.

      Comment

      • PACBOY
        Live4Boxing
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 2745
        • 1,428
        • 1,899
        • 13,903

        #13
        He will need all the money he can get...reconstructive surgery is expensive

        Comment

        • Ch@mpBox@PR
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 21432
          • 432
          • 279
          • 22,261

          #14
          Originally posted by Pullcounter
          cotto stans = floyd stans.
          Pullcounter=Gays ass ******!!!!

          Comment

          • Ch@mpBox@PR
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 21432
            • 432
            • 279
            • 22,261

            #15
            Originally posted by RodBarker
            That sounds like bull**** to me , if a WC is beaten under the weight limit his title is gone , non title fights are always over the limit never under it .
            Yeap but when the max weight of the Division is not allowed why it should be a title fight?

            This was the right move from Cotto!!!!!!

            Comment

            • RodBarker
              Banned
              • Mar 2006
              • 3857
              • 177
              • 0
              • 4,097

              #16
              [
              Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
              Yeap but when the max weight of the Division is not allowed why it should be a title fight?

              This was the right move from Cotto!!!!!!
              What Im saying is I dont think its legal , if Pac wins under the 147 limit Cotto will loose his title , thats how its always been and thats why non title fights are always over the limit .

              Comment

              • Ch@mpBox@PR
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 21432
                • 432
                • 279
                • 22,261

                #17
                Originally posted by RodBarker
                [


                What Im saying is I dont think its legal , if Pac wins under the 147 limit Cotto will loose his title , thats how its always been and thats why non title fights are always over the limit .
                Hey can you understand that, since Pacquiao is not rank as a WW, let alone by the WBO it doesnt have to be a title fight?

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #18
                  lol @ cotto fans who think they are stans!!!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP