Just like they did when Mayweather v Marquez was announced? Hippocrites!!
Why ain't Cotto huggers moaning about him facing a smaller man at a catchweight?
Collapse
-
I was against this fight at first.. but Cotto, unlike Mayweather has earned a fight like this having fought damn near everyone in the welterweight division. That's something Mayweather has never done. Pacquiao has also fought at welter and jr. welter already and Marquez never has.
Whether we like it or not both fights are happening though.. I got tired of bitching and talking about both fights. It's useless really since they are both going to happen.
IMO it should have been Mayweather v. Cotto and Pacquiao v. Marquez 3.Comment
-
Comment
-
I was against this fight at first.. but Cotto, unlike Mayweather has earned a fight like this having fought damn near everyone in the welterweight division. That's something Mayweather has never done. Pacquiao has also fought at welter and jr. welter already and Marquez never has.
Whether we like it or not both fights are happening though.. I got tired of bitching and talking about both fights. It's useless really since they are both going to happen.
IMO it should have been Mayweather v. Cotto and Pacquiao v. Marquez 3.Comment
-
Why would Floyd of fought Cotto or Margarito in 07 though when he could make 10x the money fighting De La Hoya and Hatton? This is a business after all!Comment
-
Comment
-
I was against this fight at first.. but Cotto, unlike Mayweather has earned a fight like this having fought damn near everyone in the welterweight division. That's something Mayweather has never done. Pacquiao has also fought at welter and jr. welter already and Marquez never has.
Whether we like it or not both fights are happening though.. I got tired of bitching and talking about both fights. It's useless really since they are both going to happen.
IMO it should have been Mayweather v. Cotto and Pacquiao v. Marquez 3.Comment
Comment