It's not about Cotto owing Mosley anything or Mosley owing Cotto anything. The fans deserve a second fight between the two. It was a close fight, and they need to rematch again if they both win their next fights. Cotto could beat Pacquiao and he still wouldn't be the man at 147. You're acting like Mosley got dominated in that fight, when the fight was a tooth and nail battle.
Pacquiao vs Cotto Seems Ready To Go on Nov. 14
Collapse
-
You never stop talking **** & non sense...
morales lost 2 out of 3 when he faced pacyow then beat pacyow and beat him then lost his very next fight against raheem, so morales was on the decline clearly, of course your a biased ******* so you will never admit that, the barrera fight ill have to admit is about the most quality win pac has to date against an elite guy in top form.cotto is an elite fighter but is no longer what he used to be clearly he isnt you just showed your dishonesty a few posts back by saying-"if pac wins hes the greatest welter ever if he loses its because cottos weight was too much" in other words if pac loses its the other guys fault if he wins pac is the greatest ever the only clown here is you.
Your a moron talking ****s & non sense disrespecting Morales calling him a shot...For your info of Morales losses, he suffered the first ko loss in his career to Pac...Prior to Pac losses a Morales-Raheem fight was in a lightweight level w/c is obviously Morales coming from Super Featherweight, a Morales- Barrera 3 was close w/c I believe won by Morales...He's in his peak age & peak time in w/c he was forced to retirement by Pac by way of ko losses, but i think in the Morales-David Diaz fight, i believe he won that fight even the fight was in the lightweight...Morales is a 3 weight division world champion(Super Bantam, Feather & Super Feather weight) & a Hall of Fame career, even though he lost fights w/ his fellow greats w/ Barerra & Pac, a reasonable loss to Raheem & a questionable loss to Diaz, that doesn't mean he's a shot...
And about Cotto, he has beaten & fought many legitimate boxers & champions (Mosley, Clottey, Margarito, Judah, Urkal, Gomez, Malignaggi, Quintana, Torres, Branco, Abdulaev, Jennings) & only lost once to Margarito of w/c he's leading the first half until he losses gas at the 2nd half & the Margarito wrapping controversy leaving his only loss to a question mark...
About the Pac-Cotto showdown, i agree w/ BillyBoxing Pac has a win win situation here because of his size & the status of Cotto, if Pac wins to a great ww champion like Cotto, he's one of the greatest ever w/ the 1st in boxing history to have 7 belts in 7 different weight divisions but if he lost competitively it's reasonable & will not affect his P4P status...
Comment
-
I was one of the few here who was sayin' Shane was the tougher fight for Pac and thats the one he should've took......so you wrong homie!!Comment
-
Poor your Shane.. he don't have even effective bargaining chip to fight Pac! If Pac assured him to give a shot just he move down to 135, I bet he would! See, Shane is only for money and as long as he got that, he wont mind being beatin' at dehydrated weight!
Comment
Comment