The Announcers for the Amir Khan fight....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WhoreUs
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 15770
    • 556
    • 606
    • 20,363

    #21
    Originally posted by Demise
    In my heart I knew Amir was going to win, with my head I didn't think he could do it.

    I was ****** to bet money on Kotelnik, only $40. But Khan's moving up, worked on his legs, his chin was fine ( although he complained about it afterwards ). Amazing workrate.
    i want him to get juan diaz next.

    juan has a good name and good skills but he doesn't have pop to spark amir with one punch.

    Comment

    • The Hammer
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 50797
      • 3,416
      • 8,704
      • 58,851

      #22
      Originally posted by markfrombrookly
      These guys are so bias. They seem like they wanna blow Khan right in the ring! They're just as bad if not worse then Jim Lampley! These guys are actually drooling over Khan it's disgusting. Khan is doing ok but the way they're talking it's like hes Muhammad Ali in there or something lmao.
      I agree, they sounded like a couple of ****sexuals infatuated by Khan.

      Comment

      • -Boxzilla-
        undisputed
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 7975
        • 1,230
        • 1,610
        • 14,970

        #23
        i had to mute the fight it was getting so outta hand ... ruined the fight for me ...

        Comment

        • Joan Guzman
          Banned
          • Jul 2009
          • 140
          • 18
          • 11
          • 242

          #24
          It was shocking. Kotelnik won a few rounds but according to them Khan deserved it due to keep throwing back? Kotelnik lands a few clean shots and Khan deserves credit for carrying on running.

          It was outrageous. Made me remember why I never pay for sky sports ppvs.

          Comment

          • WhoreUs
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 15770
            • 556
            • 606
            • 20,363

            #25
            Originally posted by Joan Guzman
            It was shocking. Kotelnik won a few rounds but according to them Khan deserved it due to keep throwing back? Kotelnik lands a few clean shots and Khan deserves credit for carrying on running.

            It was outrageous. Made me remember why I never pay for sky sports ppvs.
            anyone with a joan guzman handle and avatar can't talk crap about khan running.

            Comment

            • Joan Guzman
              Banned
              • Jul 2009
              • 140
              • 18
              • 11
              • 242

              #26
              Originally posted by Mr._Pink
              anyone with a joan guzman handle and avatar can't talk crap about khan running.
              What you gonna do about it, *****?

              Comment

              • MOTHER DUCKER
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 7402
                • 261
                • 177
                • 8,407

                #27
                Did Klotenik actually do something to get them talking about him in a good way at all? it was all Khan hence the scores, they are also British,

                Khan dominating + them being British= Them sucking Amir's ****, they would do if say the likes of Cotto owned Clottey or something too tho.. that's just how they commentate.

                Comment

                • D-MiZe
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 25073
                  • 1,061
                  • 371
                  • 75,542

                  #28
                  Kotelnik got dominated.

                  By the way you silly ****s who think the British commentators are biased, did you look at Watts' scorecard?

                  Comment

                  • GrizzleBoy
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 655
                    • 39
                    • 4
                    • 7,224

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Joan Guzman
                    What you gonna do about it, *****?
                    From the time commentators are going crazy over a boxer, just because he is throwing back after taking a clean hit, seemingly oblivious to the fact that those "comeback" shots landed on nothing but gloves, they really do need to just stfu.

                    Khan was winning that fight easily. He didn't need any of the overanxious commentating to make him look good.

                    Comment

                    • Pretty Boy1
                      Best In The World!!
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 7976
                      • 587
                      • 1,199
                      • 34,503

                      #30
                      Khan outworked Kotelnik!! Jim Watt gave Kotelnik 2 rounds which is about fair in my estimation. The commentators did praise Kotelnik's tight defense so they weren't completely biased! Khan is British and it's a British commentary team so what would you expect but to be honest Mr Pink and others are right in saying they over exaggerate every fight they do! I'm sure in the Pacqiuao vs David Diaz fight they compared Pac to Muhammad Ali (I think that was Sky Sports). Khan executed a great game plan, outworked Kotelnik and moved in and out avoiding the majority of Kotelnik's punches with the exception of a few! With his chin being the way it is nobody should have expected Khan to go toe to toe and slug it out!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP