Which fight's official result was much closer to the truth.

[JourneymanUK]

Close fights often result in controversial decisions. Which one among the list below do you think is closest to the truth and why?

1. Mayweather v Castillo I
2. Dela Hoya v Mayweather
3. Pacquiao v Marquez II
4. Cotto v Clottey

Poll coming up.

[Manny Duckman]

1 Pacquiao v Marquez II
2 Cotto v Clottey
3 Mayweather v Castillo I


































































4 Dela Hoya v Mayweather

[MOTHER DUCKER]

**** i meant to vote Cotto/Clottey (did pac/marquez) but then again there was 1 bad score in that fight ><

Dela Hoya/Floyd should have been a UD imo

[Silencers]

Pacquiao-Marquez 2 was a true SD fight, it could have gone either way.

[Joe2608]

Mayweather clearly beat De La Hoya.

The rest can be argued.

[JakeNDaBox]

1) Pac-Marquez II - as mentioned in another thread, I had Marquez by a point but the Split Decision justified the fight to a tee and I had no problem with Pacquiao being declared the winner

2) Cotto-Clottey - I had Miguel winning by a point. The fight was much closer than the 116-111 card offered, but 115-112 Cotto and 114-113 Clottey were fine.

3) Mayweather-Castillo I - I personally had the fight a draw (113-113), but with a gun to my head, I'd say Mayweather deserved the win by a hair. The greater issue wasn't so much his winning (although plenty argue it should've went the other way), as the ridiculously wide margins of victory on all three cards.

4) Mayweather-DLH - There is just no way in hell this was a split decision. Terrible fight, even worse PPV as a whole, but the pathetic scoring trumped it all.