Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will CATCHWEIGHT really mean much in history???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Will CATCHWEIGHT really mean much in history???

    14
    Yes, people will say catchweights is BS!
    7.14%
    1
    No, catchweights will not mean much in history!
    92.86%
    13

  • #2
    Dude talked too much about ****ing fan bases.

    And even if people wont remember if the fight was at a catchweight or not, you have to do the right thing!!!!!!!!!

    **** Catchweights!!!!!!!!!

    And By the way, the guy needs to talk more about th2 subject the video is supose to be about

    "This people are human beens before fighters" That **** annoyed the **** out of me!!!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      i have to agree with what that man said...100%



      oh...and these guys are human beings before they are boxers...just in case he forgot to mention that...

      Comment


      • #4
        8 mins 11 secs saying the same thing over and over. Now the weight won't matter to most people, everybody gives Manny full credit for beating DLH but we all know he was weight drained. I give him credit for doing what Mayweather should've done in 2007, KO DLH and send him into retirement
        Last edited by coufsax; 07-17-2009, 03:30 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          catchweight eliminates the "woulda, shoulda, coulda" of fantasy boxing...
          two warriors agree to terms to fight each other.. can't ask for anything more..
          rather than just discussing who's better between the two fighters, it is being handled inside the ring..

          just my two cents here..

          Comment


          • #6
            Bradley/Campbell/Valero etc. would be over 10 TIMES LESS MONEY than Mosley/Cotto/Mayweather

            Comment


            • #7
              the catchweight ****s everything up.......you had a 140 fighter fight a 147 champ at 147 not too long ago.......Urango vs Berto......no catchweight......Hatton came up from 140 and challenged for Floyd's WW strap at 147......no catchweight......DARE TO BE GREAT!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
                the catchweight ****s everything up.......you had a 140 fighter fight a 147 champ at 147 not too long ago.......Urango vs Berto......no catchweight......Hatton came up from 140 and challenged for Floyd's WW strap at 147......no catchweight......DARE TO BE GREAT!!
                Better to have a big fight at a catchweight than a mediocre fight at regular weight. What is Cotto comes in at 160 at fight night?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by viralsolutions View Post
                  Better to have a big fight at a catchweight than a mediocre fight at regular weight. What is Cotto comes in at 160 at fight night?
                  i agreed w/ your video, but you could've made the video a lot shorter. You rambled about the same things over and over. Be concise and straight to the point next time.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by viralsolutions View Post
                    Better to have a big fight at a catchweight than a mediocre fight at regular weight. What is Cotto comes in at 160 at fight night?
                    It doesn't matter if cotto comes in at 141 lbs, he can still rehydrate to 160 lbs.

                    The only difference is that most of cotto's training will be trying to get down to the catchweight.

                    People have to understand that its harder for a 38 year old dlh to drop weight than a 28 year old cotto.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP