The flaw in his logic is soo annoying and i'm generally a Floyd fan. In his latest video with Brian Kenny, he said that he won't fight Mosley because Shane doesn't do big PPV numbers. Few days earlier at a telephone conference, he said Floyd Mayweather vs any fighter is a big fight.
Ok Floyd, if you against any opponent is a big fight, then why does it matter if Mosley can sell PPV's or not? According to that logic, you should do big numbers with Mosley regardless because you against any fighter is a BIG PPV FIGHT RIGHT?
In the previous interview with Brian Kenny when things got heated, he dismissed Delahoya's contributions for The World Awaits PPV numbers, and took full credit for the financial success. Then why does he have a standard that fighters must be PPV attractions to be worthy to share the same ring with him. Seems that according to him, it doesn't matter who the opponent is, Floyd Mayweather's name alone will sell the fight right?
And most importantly, if he isn't gonna fight Shane or Pacquiao, then that means that he is gonna fight guys who are EVEN less PPV worthy than Mosley or Pacquiao, unless he plans to retire again.
CONTRADICTION, CONTRADICTIONS.
Ok Floyd, if you against any opponent is a big fight, then why does it matter if Mosley can sell PPV's or not? According to that logic, you should do big numbers with Mosley regardless because you against any fighter is a BIG PPV FIGHT RIGHT?
In the previous interview with Brian Kenny when things got heated, he dismissed Delahoya's contributions for The World Awaits PPV numbers, and took full credit for the financial success. Then why does he have a standard that fighters must be PPV attractions to be worthy to share the same ring with him. Seems that according to him, it doesn't matter who the opponent is, Floyd Mayweather's name alone will sell the fight right?
And most importantly, if he isn't gonna fight Shane or Pacquiao, then that means that he is gonna fight guys who are EVEN less PPV worthy than Mosley or Pacquiao, unless he plans to retire again.
CONTRADICTION, CONTRADICTIONS.
Comment