60/40 Mayweathers cut over Pacman? Fair Enough?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xxjace
    BoxingScenes Ex
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 1671
    • 89
    • 81
    • 8,257

    #1

    60/40 Mayweathers cut over Pacman? Fair Enough?

    I'm curious what people think... I think Mayweather 60% and Pacman 40% is fair? What do you guys think??How is this not fair honestly?
    17
    Fair??
    29.41%
    5
    unfair?
    70.59%
    12
  • Horus
    Greatest Of My Era
    • Dec 2007
    • 10220
    • 772
    • 112
    • 18,146

    #2
    Like i said before in the other thread.
    Originally posted by Horus
    If Floyd accepts 50/50 he is an idiot..period. From a business standpoint
    Manny Pacquiao has not proven he has the same economic draw as Mayweather. Furthermore Floyd Mayweather has more more prestige than Manny Pacquiao.


    But More importantly.

    Professional Boxing is obviously a very competitive "industry". Every year, hundreds of fighters turn professional, and every year the people who were usually on top of the sport the previous year fall victim to new fighters that intend to take that fighters spot. The number of openings is always growing, and the number of candidates continues to grow every year.

    What this means is, If you are on top You need to strike while your rod is hot.
    And take advantage of every advantage you have, And do not take a cent less than what you are worth. Because at the end of the day, it is only you who is in the ring, and Boxing dont have social security or a health care plan to fall back on like other Professional sports leagues do.

    So what they make now, is what they are going to have to live on when they are old. That is why risk vs. reward in boxing is so important.
    Because boxing unlike other sports. Does not have a safety net.



    Let's Take Shane Mosley for example:

    He's made the worst business decisions of any elite fighter arguably in the last 10 years when it has comes to his career. Whether it be turning his boss down in a third fight for $10 million after beating him twice, going to fight Winky Wright in back-to-back fights for a little over $5 million or having an opportunity to fight Floyd in November 2006 for a career payday, $8 million, but instead he chose to get dental work done and take a family vacation after coming off a tremendous performance in the Vargas fight. Just a couple years ago after losing to Winky twice, he was fighting on an ESPN undercard and from there, an HBO undercard fight on Barrera's show. These are just a few examples of why it is very important to take advantage of your momentum while you can and to know your value in the sport.



    Professional Fighters usually have to fight a decade or more before they can even see a million dollar payday if they are lucky. They usually start off fighting for purses like $3,000 and for those who are lucky to make it onto the top of the sport.
    They REALLY have to play their cards right because 1 loss may not kill your market value, but one loss with the addition to being underpaid can kill your bargaining power the next time you fight a high profile opponent if you are lucky.

    In this environment, it is easy to see why a Fighter would want to make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible.

    He never knows when the golden goose is going to die. leaving him to a life of broadcasting or a happy retirement if he’s lucky, or automobile sales and fighting way past his prime if he's not so lucky.



    So Floyd Stick to your guns, Manny Pacquiao is not undefeated
    and Manny Pacquiao has not done what you have done at the box office.


    **** Manny Pacquiao only gets 73% of his money, so that let you know what kind of businessman he is.


    To add to this Post.

    their are 2 sides to this possible match up.
    not just 1.
    Since Manny Pacquiao is now the #1 fighter in the sport. And it is now upon him to to be the face of boxing. like some of you guys state he is.

    He needs to do whatever he can to make the fight happen.
    I didnt see Floyd back out of the de la hoya fight when he was the #1 p4p when the sport and de la hoya demanded more money. because the world awaited to see that fight.

    So it shouldnt be a problem for Pacquiao to do the same thing for Mayweather because that is the fight the world awaits to see.

    Manny Pacquiao is going to make more money fighting Floyd than he would anybody else, so the money shouldnt be a probelm for Manny.
    Since he is the so called people champion. He should fight this fight for the people and not for the money..
    Unless he wants to change his name to

    Manny "Money" Pacquiao

    Comment

    • Horus
      Greatest Of My Era
      • Dec 2007
      • 10220
      • 772
      • 112
      • 18,146

      #3
      good luck with the thread.

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #4
        60/40 is more than generous, from the deep graces of Floyd's heart would he only allow 60/40.

        Comment

        • Talisayen
          Title User
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 13995
          • 5,216
          • 10,394
          • 976,564

          #5
          Considering Mayweather owes tons of money from the IRS and his trash collector. 70/30 is more than fair enough.



          Of course in Pacquiao's favor

          Comment

          • DLT
            DMV
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 17087
            • 737
            • 35
            • 24,277

            #6
            Originally posted by xxjace
            I'm curious what people think... I think Mayweather 60% and Pacman 40% is fair? What do you guys think??How is this not fair honestly?
            I dont know about 60/40 but definatly Floyd should get no less than 57.5/42.5

            Comment

            • xxjace
              BoxingScenes Ex
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 1671
              • 89
              • 81
              • 8,257

              #7
              I just dont see how 60/40 isnt fair...

              Comment

              • Easy-E
                Gotta want it
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22686
                • 865
                • 1,739
                • 32,777

                #8
                It is fair when you look at the situation logically. However I think 55/45 is fair and more likely.

                Comment

                • -Antonio-
                  -Antonio-
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 24259
                  • 629
                  • 163
                  • 38,153

                  #9
                  No way Mayweather gets anything better than 50-50.

                  If Pacquiao/Mayweather happens, that's assuming Manny beats Cotto. That would give him titles in 7 weight classes. That's legendary. Pacquiao is a bigger star now than Mayweather is.

                  Comment

                  • xxjace
                    BoxingScenes Ex
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 1671
                    • 89
                    • 81
                    • 8,257

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Easy-E
                    It is fair when you look at the situation logically. However I think 55/45 is fair and more likely.
                    thats true..I agree with this also..

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP