So...what do ya'll consider ATG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -EX-
    Trading Block Tycoon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 21258
    • 720
    • 689
    • 32,678

    #11
    Originally posted by mangler
    I hate this ****. I dunno how cats place fighters unless they keep their personal list saved or sumthin.
    Well everything's hypothetical...idk anyone who has an actual list.

    Kinda hard to do...I never seen Henry Armstrong fight

    I'm jus askin how far along wud u go number wise for sum1 to be ATG

    Comment

    • Jayseen
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 598
      • 39
      • 158
      • 11,518

      #12
      I consider an all time great someone who has faced the best opposition and has proven to be dominant in his weight class and one of the best fighters p4p in the world. Someone who has greats skills and shows to be a tough challenge and a huge risk for anyone. (Sorry i'm drunk)

      Comment

      • WhoreUs
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 15770
        • 556
        • 606
        • 20,363

        #13
        Originally posted by The_Executioner
        In your mind is ATG...top 20 or 25? top 30? top 50? 40?

        Well...?

        Poll to come...
        one of the best (can be argued as the #1 or 2 guy) in his division (except super middleweight and cruiserweight since those are new)

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #14
          An all-time great for me is a guy who is remembered in their era because of their accomplishments. I can't really put a number as far as rank.

          Like the past couple decades, all-time greats would be:

          Roy Jones
          Bernard Hopkins
          Pernell Whitaker
          Felix Trinidad
          Oscar De La Hoya
          Floyd Mayweather
          Lennox Lewis
          Joe Calzaghe
          Shane Mosley
          Manny Pacquiao
          Erik Morales
          Marco Antonio Barrera

          Just some examples. These are all guys that in the future when describing the 90's and 00's, we will be talking about.

          Comment

          • AssasinKing
            UNITED
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 5968
            • 169
            • 116
            • 13,253

            #15
            Originally posted by KnockoutTheFat
            That's easy...

            Win % is greater or equal to 95 %
            Popularity is equal to 100%
            Number of fights exceeds 50
            Win 3 belt(s) in two different weight classes
            P4P ranking equals #1
            Win an ESPN Wednesday Night Fight
            Win an ESPN Friday Night Fight
            Win a PPV Fight
            Defend title(s) at least 8 times
            I LOL'd!!!! But thats G.O.A.T not ATG :P

            I got 10 fights before i get GOAT :/ stil...undefeated online so far..only had like 10 fights tho

            Comment

            • D-MiZe
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 25073
              • 1,061
              • 371
              • 75,542

              #16
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              An all-time great for me is a guy who is remembered in their era because of their accomplishments. I can't really put a number as far as rank.

              Like the past couple decades, all-time greats would be:

              Roy Jones
              Bernard Hopkins
              Pernell Whitaker
              Felix Trinidad
              Oscar De La Hoya
              Floyd Mayweather
              Lennox Lewis
              Joe Calzaghe
              Shane Mosley
              Manny Pacquiao
              Erik Morales
              Marco Antonio Barrera

              Just some examples. These are all guys that in the future when describing the 90's and 00's, we will be talking about.
              Why Morales?

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #17
                Originally posted by Demise
                Why Morales?
                I can't put Barrera or Pacquiao without Morales.

                Comment

                • D-MiZe
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 25073
                  • 1,061
                  • 371
                  • 75,542

                  #18
                  Originally posted by bojangles1987
                  I can't put Barrera or Pacquiao without Morales.
                  Pacman qualifies without Morales tbh, he's got wins over;

                  Hatton
                  Marquez
                  MAB x2
                  Diaz
                  DLH

                  Comment

                  • yeks
                    Too Good To Be True
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1347
                    • 430
                    • 331
                    • 10,604

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Demise
                    Why Morales?
                    morales is a 3 division champion.. only few can do that..
                    how people really have a short memory..
                    he was one of the best boxer ever laced at 122..

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP