all the current top 10 p4p fighters suck and should be placed at 11-20

**MakeDamnSure** · 07-13-2009, 10:16 PM

Why are you red?

**baracuda** · 07-13-2009, 10:18 PM

why exclude only the black fighters?.....

**Equinox** · 07-13-2009, 10:18 PM

Originally posted by MakeDamnSure

Why are you red?

what does that mean?

**oc9979** · 07-13-2009, 10:27 PM

if you going to take them out who would you put there??
you are leaving hopkins which he is not fighting at all right now.
mosley who is waiting for an invitation to fight?
Cotto will fight 3 times already and mosley still holding to the antonio margarito fight

**MakeDamnSure** · 07-13-2009, 10:29 PM

Originally posted by marsh all.

what does that mean?

it means you're the least credible poster and no one is taking you seriously. Most Cotto fans are red k.

**mochoso91** · 07-13-2009, 10:31 PM

Its simple.. put #1 the winner of the 168 tourney! its fair

**Equinox** · 07-13-2009, 10:32 PM

Originally posted by MakeDamnSure

it means you're the least credible poster and no one is taking you seriously. Most Cotto fans are red k.

oh **** you scared me haha. if im still alive and if im not going to prison over it, i dont give half a ****.

**MANGLER** · 07-13-2009, 10:32 PM

Originally posted by marsh all.

this has to be the most terrible top 10 ever, excluding hopkins and mosley.

p.s. im trying to get my points up so i would appreciate it if mangler and his team posted alot of posts about nothing in here to give my thread some activity, thanks.

There's worse threads than this homey. No need to call in the man on this one. That only happens on complete garbage threads. This is just an opinion, not flagrant trash. Post some bull**** thread and when I get back on in a couple hrs, I might get back to ya.

all the current top 10 p4p fighters suck and should be placed at 11-20