He might be able to avenge the loss against Glen Johnson, but not both. Like someone mentioned, he relies on his speed and reflexes, and we all know that the reflexes is the first thing to go in boxing.
Now Roy Jones probobly question his very own chin, and that leads to downfall for any boxer. Just ask Wladimir Klitschko.
Roy Jones certainly is not anywhere near the greatests fighters in the sport, but he may be the one with most talent in history of the sport.
However, I don't feel that it's necessary for a fighter to be in a war to be labelled great. If you are so freakin' good that you just outclass every single guy you face, then how can it be fair to say that someone who gets lucky with single punches against top competition is any greater?
Why can't you guys just settle with that Roy Jones Jr. was the best in the world at what he did, outbox and outsmart others.
And accept that Holyfield is better at going to war, and that Trinidad is better to stalk people and knock them out.
You can't compare those, it's not fair to any of them.
Now Roy Jones probobly question his very own chin, and that leads to downfall for any boxer. Just ask Wladimir Klitschko.
Roy Jones certainly is not anywhere near the greatests fighters in the sport, but he may be the one with most talent in history of the sport.
However, I don't feel that it's necessary for a fighter to be in a war to be labelled great. If you are so freakin' good that you just outclass every single guy you face, then how can it be fair to say that someone who gets lucky with single punches against top competition is any greater?
Why can't you guys just settle with that Roy Jones Jr. was the best in the world at what he did, outbox and outsmart others.
And accept that Holyfield is better at going to war, and that Trinidad is better to stalk people and knock them out.
You can't compare those, it's not fair to any of them.
Comment