Why is there a double standard with Pac?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

I hear you man but honestly are you going to tell me that the Oscar he fought was in great shape and not weight drained. Freddie Roch said it himself that he knew he was weight drained in the Hatton pac 24-7

I think what bothers people is this whole catchweight issue. He is taking advantage of the situations to favor him in every way.

Lets see him rematch JMM and 135 or fight Valero at 135. Maybe he isnt proven but youmust have forgotten that Pac won the title back in the day as a fill in
everyone needs a shot. Pac has joined the golden boy club. He only fights for checks not for legacy

read Pink's post....de la hoya PICKED pacquiao...he coulda manned up and fought the winner of margs/cotto...but he picked manny...how he came in that night was on him

[-MAKAVELLI-]

"Fanny Pac cherry picked the sorriest mofo at 135! Campbell woulda beat his ass! And he cherrypicked old, weight drained DLH who had already been beaten by Mr boat buyer. And we all know Hatton was there to be had by ANYBODY. He wasn't the champ of **** at 140. Bradley and Nate both school Fanny Pac! he's got nothin on Mr boat buyer ya hear me? Nothin!"

****** ass kids and their dumbass comments....who said that maing? deja?

[rizkybizness]

pac ducked bruce lee in the 70s

***in *****

[Chuckguy]

read Pink's post....de la hoya PICKED pacquiao...he coulda manned up and fought the winner of margs/cotto...but he picked manny...how he came in that night was on him

right on man
good looking out
but you know that oscar was not in true form and it had little to do with manny
it was the weight that Oscar agreed to fight at. so it was oscars fault.
He shuld have manned up and fought margs or cotto

[wrakneelyo]

I wouldn't say Pac wasn't fighting for legacy. You're telling me fighting Cotto whom just last year everybody was talking about Cotto being the fight that needs to happen with Mayweather as a non legacy fight? He's fighting him for the 7th division to be champion at. Cotto has one freaking loss and everybody's saying that Margarito took something from Cotto.

Well let me ask this. Then does that mean the Torrecampo fight took something from Manny? How about the UD loss to Morales? Then how about the Singsurat fight?

Cotto gets one loss and all of a sudden he's done? Hatton gets one loss (To Mayweather no less) and he's done??

But it's okay that Pacquiao losses to MOrales and 2 unknowns to keep getting better?

Whatever happened to "Learn from your losses?" It seems like Pacquiao is the only fighter to have the *sarcasm*privilege to have that. The rest are: It has taken something from that fighter.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

right on man
good looking out
but you know that oscar was not in true form and it had little to do with manny
it was the weight that Oscar agreed to fight at. so it was oscars fault.
He shuld have manned up and fought margs or cotto

oscar hasnt been in true form since he beat fernando vargas...he could have fought cotto and forced miguel to move up to 54...that borikua would have done it...but that was too much risk...DLH thought he was gonna have an easy fight with PAC and it would have set up another massive payday against Hatton…serves him right…his punk ass got retired by midget

[wrakneelyo]

I wouldn't say Pac wasn't fighting for legacy. You're telling me fighting Cotto whom just last year everybody was talking about Cotto being the fight that needs to happen with Mayweather as a non legacy fight? He's fighting him for the 7th division to be champion at. Cotto has one freaking loss and everybody's saying that Margarito took something from Cotto.

Well let me ask this. Then does that mean the Torrecampo fight took something from Manny? How about the UD loss to Morales? Then how about the Singsurat fight?

Cotto gets one loss and all of a sudden he's done? Hatton gets one loss (To Mayweather no less) and he's done??

But it's okay that Pacquiao losses to MOrales and 2 unknowns to keep getting better?

Whatever happened to "Learn from your losses?" It seems like Pacquiao is the only fighter to have the *sarcasm*privilege to have that. The rest are: It has taken something from that fighter.

It's just interesting to know what the difference is honestly. Since by all rights and accounts that first fight with Morales, nobody would've blamed Pacquiao for declining after that.

[kocface]

Both of them have better resumes??

Campbell: Funeka, J Diaz, Acorro, Quiles, Zegan, Hlatswayo.. Are you serious?

Guzman: Ameth Diaz (Whoever he is), Soto, Davis, Barrios, Jauregui, Jandaeng.

.....

lol agreed, the barrera, morales, and marquez pacquiao fought would have all beaten both guzman and cambell at the time imho