Proof that JMM's SACK is bigger than Packy's

[Dirk Diggler UK]

This isn't about resume pink. Its about SACK and comparative sack sizes.

JMM sack >>>> Packy's sack.

Pics or STFU

[Mersey]

I thought you were actually gonna show us pictures of their bollox.

Im well disappointed.

Me too. At least some weigh in pics.

[Deja_Vous]

Who's more dangerous a potshotting runner in Mayweather or a aggresive power punching tank like Cotto...?? Be honest now...

Cotto's been on his bike more than Lance Armstrong lately.

[WhoreUs]

This isn't about resume pink. Its about SACK and comparative sack sizes.

JMM sack >>>> Packy's sack.

by sack you mean taking on the most dangerous opponents right?

the most dangerous opponents = the better opponents

better resume = better opponents



let's look at who they fought since they first met up at 126:

2004
Pacquiao - Fahsan 3K Battery
Marquez - Oscar Salido

2005
Pacquiao - Erik Morales , Hector Velasquez
Marquez - Victor Polo

2006
Pacquiao - Erik Morales , Oscar Larios , Erik Morales
Marquez - Chris John , Jimrex Jaca , Taerdsak Jandeang

2007
Pacquiao - Jorge Solis , Marco Antonio Barrera
Marquez - Marco Antonio Barrera , Rocky Juarez

2008
Pacquiao - David Diaz , Oscar De La hoya
Marquez - Joel Casamayor

2009
Pacquiao - Ricky Hatton
Marquez - Juan Diaz

I don't see a single of Marquez's opponents that would have beat Pacquiao.

Can you say the same for Marquez?

[madsweeney]

Cotto's been on his bike more than Lance Armstrong lately.

Give it up, no matter how many times you say it, in no matter how many threads it ain't funny.

Now I know your proud of that one but why don't you take a week or two and come up with another "witty" comment.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

by sack you mean taking on the most dangerous opponents right?

the most dangerous opponents = the better opponents

better resume = better opponents



let's look at who they fought since they first met up at 126:

2004
Pacquiao - Fahsan 3K Battery
Marquez - Oscar Salido

2005
Pacquiao - Erik Morales , Hector Velasquez
Marquez - Victor Polo

2006
Pacquiao - Erik Morales , Oscar Larios , Erik Morales
Marquez - Chris John , Jimrex Jaca , Taerdsak Jandeang

2007
Pacquiao - Jorge Solis , Marco Antonio Barrera
Marquez - Marco Antonio Barrera , Jorge Solis

2008
Pacquiao - David Diaz , Oscar De La hoya
Marquez - Joel Casamayor

2009
Pacquiao - Ricky Hatton
Marquez - Juan Diaz

I don't see a single of Marquez's opponents that would have beat Pacquiao.

Can you say the same for Marquez?

Juan Diaz is 50/50 against Packy. And Chris John and Joel Casamayor have a good chance at winning U'd's against him.

JMM could've beat every single one of Pac's opponents too.

Packy asks for catchweights, JMM doesn't. Even though the opponent is much tougher.

[WhoreUs]

Juan Diaz is 50/50 against Packy. And Chris John and Joel Casamayor have a good chance at winning U'd's against him.

JMM could've beat every single one of Pac's opponents too.

Packy asks for catchweights, JMM doesn't. Even though the opponent is much tougher.

juan diaz has no chance against pacquiao.

neither does chris john or the 50 yr. old casamayor that marquez beat.



marquez does not beat the washed up oscar pacquiao fought nor ricky hatton.

marquez does not put on weight as well as pacquiao. 130 jmm does not let juan diaz bully him like that.

[Pullcounter]

Not only did JMM go all the way to the phillipines to challenge FudgePacky to a 3rd fight like a man, (Packy said no, like a woman)....

But JMM asked for a tougher fight (Floyd), a fight Roach has admitted he doesn't like for Packy but would take for the money. (Typical)

Furthermore, not only did JMM ask for the tougher fight,but he's moving up 2 divisions to do it w/ out bitching.

While FudgePacky takes an easier fight w/ an easier to hit guy, and he wants a ***** catchweight of 43. Where it will be obvious Cotto will be a dead man walking.

Were on to you FudgePacky, not only do you have a small sack (especially compared to JMM, your 2x conqueror) but its clear the only way you could beat fighters is by asking for every possible advantage possible.

It is clear from this overview that JMM has the far bigger SACK.

I'm done here.

FudgePacky getting a call from his daddy JMM. "Hiiii daddy...nuting pirsonal, I'm just scared ob reel pights...."

[IMG]http://i293.***********.com/albums/mm41/crazyguitarplayer01/kwebhf.jpg[/IMG]

wow you are really really familiar w/ jmm's sack. (no ****)

[Gutz]

Owe my god that picture.

LOL... I said the same shiet...

[FLY TY]

Not only did JMM go all the way to the phillipines to challenge FudgePacky to a 3rd fight like a man, (Packy said no, like a woman)....

But JMM asked for a tougher fight (Floyd), a fight Roach has admitted he doesn't like for Packy but would take for the money. (Typical)

Furthermore, not only did JMM ask for the tougher fight,but he's moving up 2 divisions to do it w/ out bitching.

While FudgePacky takes an easier fight w/ an easier to hit guy, and he wants a ***** catchweight of 43. Where it will be obvious Cotto will be a dead man walking.

Were on to you FudgePacky, not only do you have a small sack (especially compared to JMM, your 2x conqueror) but its clear the only way you could beat fighters is by asking for every possible advantage possible.

It is clear from this overview that JMM has the far bigger SACK.

I'm done here.

FudgePacky getting a call from his daddy JMM. "Hiiii daddy...nuting pirsonal, I'm just scared ob reel pights...."

[IMG]http://i293.***********.com/albums/mm41/crazyguitarplayer01/kwebhf.jpg[/IMG]

marquez wants the payday.....not only that, but losing to the best fighter on the planet, at a higher weight class, won't hurt marquez's marketability. not to mention floyd hasn't fought in 2 years..... marquez is in a win-win situation here....you're giving him too much credit.