Problem with present

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eazy_mas
    Pride kills the champ
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 9758
    • 244
    • 308
    • 17,756

    #1

    Problem with present

    Today people are not that patient.They want everything now and fast and they are alway on run and busy.

    So what has this to do with boxing. I notice most of the old school boxer have much more patience in the ring. They are commietted to there gameplan. They jab and study there opponnet before excuting there plan.

    Today there is only Mayweather and Wlad who could think of take there there time in the ring. and that is why there there one of the best there is.


    The problem is when you want to impresse the crowd by trying to KO someone in the 1st round usally you end up using alot of stamina and if you fail it probably going to cause you to KO.

    another problem is that punchs like the punchs to the body have very big effect on the opponnet as well as jabs which is dont quickly and could lose you oppenet rhythme.

    These two punchs are sometimes forgotten. one good example of a fighter who lost because he didnt jab is Hashim Rahman.

    Hashim Rahman has the potental to beat even Wlad but the problem is he is not commited to his jabs. Hashim Rahman won Lennox Lewis with a jab to the stomatch the overhead right was just a finishing move but he wore im down with the jab. As for the Olge fight Hashim was winning when he was jabbing but when he stopped jabbing Ogle straight away gained control of the fight.
  • eazy_mas
    Pride kills the champ
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 9758
    • 244
    • 308
    • 17,756

    #2
    Also the fear of lossing the O.

    other problem in boxing that fans are unforgiving compared to the old school boxers.

    I think it because thr $50.00 PPV

    Comment

    • MANGLER
      Sex Tape Flop Artist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 30142
      • 1,705
      • 2,355
      • 46,598

      #3
      Rahman already lost to Wlad in cased you missed it TS. He ain't got potential to do anything anymore.

      And nothin wrong wit boxing tactically if it's what a fighter is good at. Boxing can be fun to watch, just not everybody appreciates it.

      Comment

      • eazy_mas
        Pride kills the champ
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2005
        • 9758
        • 244
        • 308
        • 17,756

        #4
        Originally posted by mangler
        Rahman already lost to Wlad in cased you missed it TS. He ain't got potential to do anything anymore.

        And nothin wrong wit boxing tactically if it's what a fighter is good at. Boxing can be fun to watch, just not everybody appreciates it.
        oooh forgot I stopped following boxing that time

        but he has a chance to win Olge when I seen that fight.

        Wlad take his time in the ring and doesnt want to take unneccary risks. He studies his oppenent.

        People alway complain and want to see a KO.

        Comment

        • The_Demon
          Big dog
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 13604
          • 1,354
          • 888
          • 22,971

          #5
          Originally posted by eazy_mas
          oooh forgot I stopped following boxing that time

          but he has a chance to win Olge when I seen that fight.

          Wlad take his time in the ring and doesnt want to take unneccary risks. He studies his oppenent.

          People alway complain and want to see a KO.
          for 50 dollars or wotever u americans pay,people want to be entertained-simple as that,forget all this appreciating true skills bull

          Comment

          • The_Demon
            Big dog
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 13604
            • 1,354
            • 888
            • 22,971

            #6
            Originally posted by eazy_mas
            Today people are not that patient.They want everything now and fast and they are alway on run and busy.

            So what has this to do with boxing. I notice most of the old school boxer have much more patience in the ring. They are commietted to there gameplan. They jab and study there opponnet before excuting there plan.

            Today there is only Mayweather and Wlad who could think of take there there time in the ring. and that is why there there one of the best there is.


            The problem is when you want to impresse the crowd by trying to KO someone in the 1st round usally you end up using alot of stamina and if you fail it probably going to cause you to KO.

            another problem is that punchs like the punchs to the body have very big effect on the opponnet as well as jabs which is dont quickly and could lose you oppenet rhythme.

            These two punchs are sometimes forgotten. one good example of a fighter who lost because he didnt jab is Hashim Rahman.

            Hashim Rahman has the potental to beat even Wlad but the problem is he is not commited to his jabs. Hashim Rahman won Lennox Lewis with a jab to the stomatch the overhead right was just a finishing move but he wore im down with the jab. As for the Olge fight Hashim was winning when he was jabbing but when he stopped jabbing Ogle straight away gained control of the fight.
            its an insult to compare floyd to that boring robotic wlad,hes like watching paint dry

            Comment

            • KittenFlaps
              Punch Drunk
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 1252
              • 59
              • 38
              • 7,414

              #7
              I like watching boxers if they do it well, put together combinations, psychologically break their opponents. If they are just there to jab and score points I find it boring.

              If I had a choice though I'd much rather watch a Duran or Gatti than a Mayweather or Wright. It's all about the moxie. Gotta have moxie.

              Comment

              • eazy_mas
                Pride kills the champ
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2005
                • 9758
                • 244
                • 308
                • 17,756

                #8
                Originally posted by KittenFlaps
                I like watching boxers if they do it well, put together combinations, psychologically break their opponents. If they are just there to jab and score points I find it boring.

                If I had a choice though I'd much rather watch a Duran or Gatti than a Mayweather or Wright. It's all about the moxie. Gotta have moxie.
                GAtti sure is one heck of entertiantment but it not the way to win.

                But if a fighter loses no matter how expolsive he is people dont tend to remeber him if he lost his next fight or he will wont have the big championship level fight

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP