Why did Whitaker and Camacho never fight?

**Fox McCloud** · 07-08-2009, 12:37 AM

Because fighters who are undefeated like Camacho generally don't like to be slaughtered by the best boxer since the Fab 4 era.

**Scott9945** · 07-08-2009, 12:39 AM

If I remember correctly, they were good friends. And thinking about it, possibly coke buddies as well.

**street bully** · 07-08-2009, 12:41 AM

Camacho would have been sonned.

**Fox McCloud** · 07-08-2009, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by Scott9945

If I remember correctly, they were good friends. And thinking about it, possibly coke buddies as well.

It's weird how friendships come about... Whitaker seems like he would be irritated by all the ridiculous **** Camacho did.

**-EX-** · 07-08-2009, 02:43 AM

bumpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

**F l i c k e r** · 07-08-2009, 02:54 AM

Originally posted by DWiens421

Because fighters who are undefeated like Camacho generally don't like to be slaughtered by the best boxer since the Fab 4 era.

ding ding ding... correct answer.

**BennyST** · 07-08-2009, 02:58 AM

Originally posted by street bully

Camacho would have been sonned.

Just out of curiosity, what the hell does that even mean?

Anyway, yeah, Whitaker would have won. He was much better on the exchanges and would have played the offensive aggressor in this fight. Could have been good, could have been really terrible.

**Bhopreign** · 07-08-2009, 02:59 AM

Im not sure Sweet Pea beats Camacho, could go either way.

**JM1** · 07-08-2009, 03:00 AM

good question.. i also wonder why

Why did Whitaker and Camacho never fight?