marvin hagler vs bernard hopkins in middleweight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chr0nic
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 4501
    • 191
    • 213
    • 5,494

    #11
    Originally posted by Mr._Pink
    please......

    spare me.

    hopkins ain't on hagler's level.
    you think a prime b-hop loses to a prime marvin hagler?
    with a 4 inch size differrence?
    the hopkins that actually had a workout
    the hopkins that ko'd tito would not lose to hagler

    i dunno why you overrate hagler/leonard/duran/hearns so much
    they were simply the best of an era, does'nt mean they are so great as too being able to beat bernard hopkins, roy jones or even monzon


    prime hopkins does'nt fight to save stamina in the later rounds, there only little potshots here and there

    Comment

    • Pugilistic™
      MV3
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2006
      • 9848
      • 324
      • 305
      • 16,773

      #12
      This is a tough fight to predict.

      Both fighters have advantages over one another that they could use to win.

      It would either be a decision either way.

      Comment

      • Ishy Aytan
        Undisputed Champion
        • Apr 2008
        • 2184
        • 66
        • 64
        • 8,726

        #13
        Hopkins seems to be heavily underrated by some guys on here. It would be a great close fight and either man could win.

        It wont be as one sided as others think.

        Comment

        • Chr0nic
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 4501
          • 191
          • 213
          • 5,494

          #14
          Originally posted by Ishy Aytan
          Hopkins seems to be heavily underrated by some guys on here. It would be a great close fight and either man could win.

          It wont be as one sided as others think.
          it's not that hopkins is underrated it's that when you put a current fighter against a fighter in the past, the past fighter will be favoured, people feel they have to pay respects to a great no longer fighting old fighter, pity pretty much, wish people would just grow up

          Comment

          • Pugilistic™
            MV3
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 9848
            • 324
            • 305
            • 16,773

            #15
            Originally posted by Ishy Aytan
            Hopkins seems to be heavily underrated by some guys on here. It would be a great close fight and either man could win.

            It wont be as one sided as others think.
            I wouldn't take anything Mr pink says about Hopkins seriously.

            He hates poor old mr Hopkins.

            Comment

            • boxasmash
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 7039
              • 222
              • 63
              • 14,591

              #16
              Originally posted by Chr0nic
              i'd bet on hopkins winning
              just imagine marvin hagler against himself only the other hagler is 4 inches taller
              what the ****???????????????

              you must be joking.

              Comment

              • boxasmash
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 7039
                • 222
                • 63
                • 14,591

                #17
                if anything hopkins is overrated.

                Comment

                • Ishy Aytan
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2184
                  • 66
                  • 64
                  • 8,726

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Chr0nic
                  it's not that hopkins is underrated it's that when you put a current fighter against a fighter in the past, the past fighter will be favoured, people feel they have to pay respects to a great no longer fighting old fighter, pity pretty much, wish people would just grow up


                  The only guy in the 90's onwards that i'd bet on beating Hagler is Hopkins. Hagler was the best middleweight of his era and Hopkins is the best of our era.

                  Comment

                  • Chr0nic
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 4501
                    • 191
                    • 213
                    • 5,494

                    #19
                    Originally posted by boxasmash
                    what the ****???????????????

                    you must be joking.
                    i must be joking? you assume because i give hopkins a chance against your baldy god? kill yourself

                    Comment

                    • boxasmash
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 7039
                      • 222
                      • 63
                      • 14,591

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Chr0nic
                      i must be joking? you assume because i give hopkins a chance against your baldy god? kill yourself
                      hopkins is the same as hagler just 4 inches taller.

                      that is pure comedy.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP