What is this fuss about Pac not fighting black fighters ...ill logic. Ledwaba much?

[madsweeney]

they think ledwaba hates fried chicken and watermelons.

LOL...I've yet to meet a Filipino that hates fried chicken and watermelon!!! We just serve it with rice and sweet chili sauce

[larry x]

one black fighter..

[madsweeney]

one black fighter..

How many black fighters have there been under 135 while Pac's been fighting? What he passed up 2 to move up to bigger fights?

[Levcon8686]

There have been none worthy enough for him to fight throughout his career path. End of story. Can anyone name a black fighter he ''ducked''? Some people just have racist/hating agendas.

[comanick]

I think anyone with a brain should understand that nate means style not actual race. It just that the majority of the people who fight in that slick style are africans americans. But it is true that pac has never fought someone with that style. IMO to be p4p # 1 you have to be a guy who can beat all styles but we dont really know that about pac because he only fights come-forward type of fighters. That is a fact not an opinion. Pac is a good fighter but i would call him great until he beats a guy that can actual play defense and move his head a little. I think pac is great for the sport and i love his style but i still see all the flaws that were there years ago. Other people dont notice because he has been fighting guys that play to his strenght but in all honesty I can see a slick guy totally outboxing him and it doesnt even have to be floyd.

[mikelovesfood]

I think anyone with a brain should understand that nate means style not actual race. It just that the majority of the people who fight in that slick style are africans americans. But it is true that pac has never fought someone with that style.

When you say nate are you referring this "slick" African-American?

IMO to be p4p # 1 you have to be a guy who can beat all styles but we dont really know that about pac because he only fights come-forward type of fighters. That is a fact not an opinion. Pac is a good fighter but i would call him great until he beats a guy that can actual play defense and move his head a little.

I love how you say "That is a fact not an opinion". and "until he beats a guy that can actual play defense and move his head a little". Does JMM ring a bell? Is he not ranked on the general consensus of boxing writers #2 p4p as of right now? What's the first thing always mentioned when JMM comes into a conversation...Counter-puncher! Emphasize on the word COUNTER!

I think pac is great for the sport and i love his style but i still see all the flaws that were there years ago. Other people dont notice because he has been fighting guys that play to his strenght but in all honesty I can see a slick guy totally outboxing him and it doesnt even have to be floyd.

Do you think the main reason why he has such a big fanbase is because people think he has no flaws? It's because the little ****er plays off as this sympathetic, come from the bottom to the top, humble person. He doesn't lose a few times and retires..no. He sets an example, learns from his mistakes and moves on period. Personality traits of a true Peoples Champ. Exactly what this recession-riddened Country needs right now. I could go on.

Do your research before post on the forums scrub.