What's with all the BS about pac not fighting a black guy?

[Haterfree]

name 3 black fighters that are better than the 3 mexican greats in the lower division. oh and they have to be active during the time when pac has been fighting them

The fact is none of those guys fought any real Black fighter lately. The last time they did Zahir Raheem took Erik Morales to school. And excuses already abound from the haters for Juan Marquez who is about to get beat up by Floyd Mayweather.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

nothing more than journalistic sensationalism.

If u bothered to look at Pacquiao's record, u can see he fought 3 straight "black" skinned fighters. But i guess thats not good enough because the werent "american black."

Then we hear the garbage about "american black" fighters because they are slick. As if only "black american" fighters are the only fighters capable of being slick.

6-23-2001
Lehnolo Ledwaba tko 6

11-10-2001
Agapito Sanchez (very slick & dirty fighter) Draw

6-8-2002
Jorge Julio tko 2

That's 3 straight "black" fighters. But since they are not "american black" they are incapable of being slick.

[hotshoes]

Exactly!!

Mayweather would give his right arm for the names Barrera/Morales on his resume.

correct, i don't get these clowns trying to downplay the greats by saying they are not black. such shameful acts are not needed in boxing

[Beater_of_ass]

Exactly!!

Mayweather would give his right arm for the names Barrera/Morales on his resume.

Nah, they had a chance at beating him so he'd never want to fight them. As far as the topic goes, we have a black president, how much more can the racial card be played, seriously?

[Haterfree]

Exactly!!

Mayweather would give his right arm for the names Barrera/Morales on his resume.

Pacman would give both of his arms to have the names Hernandez, Diego Corrales, Castillo twice, & olympic medalist on his resume.

[wizard king]

it doest even matter what race pac has fought i dont know why people always trying to make **** racial

[hotshoes]

The fact is none of those guys fought any real Black fighter lately. The last time they did Zahir Raheem took Erik Morales to school. And excuses already abound from the haters for Juan Marquez who is about to get beat up by Floyd Mayweather.

dont give me that answer dude. i said name 3 in their division. now answer the first question. and you actually think zahir is a great black fighter? if so how come he has only 1 notable win?

[hotshoes]

nothing more than journalistic sensationalism.

If u bothered to look at Pacquiao's record, u can see he fought 3 straight "black" skinned fighters. But i guess thats not good enough because the werent "american black."

Then we hear the garbage about "american black" fighters because they are slick. As if only "black american" fighters are the only fighters capable of being slick.

6-23-2001
Lehnolo Ledwaba tko 6

11-10-2001
Agapito Sanchez (very slick & dirty fighter) Draw

6-8-2002
Jorge Julio tko 2

That's 3 straight "black" fighters. But since they are not "american black" they are incapable of being slick.

yeah its sickening, from black to american black. just one excuse after another

[Haterfree]

Nah, they had a chance at beating him so he'd never want to fight them. As far as the topic goes, we have a black president, how much more can the racial card be played, seriously?

***** is mixed & go learn some history. You will find that Racism is a serious problem throughout human history not a card game.

[victorythagr8]

Umm no he wouldnt.

Stick to the topic.

Pac has always avoded slick defensive style boxers...like Guzman.

he avoided guzman for Marquez(far better fighter than Guzman), david diaz(for a belt), Oscar delahoya(biggest paycheck), Ricky Hatton(paycheck, a 140 linear title) and now miguel cotto(far bigger threat than Guzman) and pacman talking about fighting floyd(floyd the one ****ed up the fight by getting injured). Really last time guzman was about to fight a threat he chicken out like ***** and went over weight.