"Tell me one African-American fighter he (Pacquiao) fought" --Nate Campbell

[Spacey1991]

i hate ALL slick defensive boxers.

except byrd. i liked chris byrd.

Just cause you don't like them doesn't mean they are bad fighters, this is a sport, with tactics... not all fights have to be toe to toe wars, hitting and moving isn't as bad as you are making out. I can't see how it is a bad thing to see somebody able to slip and block punches good.

[Bhopreign]

people that don't know anything about boxing bets.

most boxing people thought oscar would win. those who picked pac were just wishful thinkers.

Wrong, people that actually know about boxing bet on him, I know some. Besides nobody bets big money thinking they are going to lose, thats idiotic. This took 3 seconds to google.

http://www.mmabettingblog.com/2008/1...pacquiao-odds/

[WhoreUs]

Just cause you don't like them doesn't mean they are bad fighters, this is a sport, with tactics... not all fights have to be toe to toe wars, hitting and moving isn't as bad as you are making out. I can't see how it is a bad thing to see somebody able to slip and block punches good.

you can slip and block and still be offensive.

most slick defensive boxers nowadays fight not to lose instead of fighting to win.



you can be offensive and have good defense and not get into toe to toe wars.

look at winky wright. good defense but he'll come forward and touch you up.

[Bhopreign]

Cant win if you dont throw and land, which means the slick "defensive" boxers are doing more than what else other style the opponent is.

[WhoreUs]

Wrong, people that actually know about boxing bet on him, I know some. Besides nobody bets big money thinking they are going to lose, thats idiotic. This took 3 seconds to google.

http://www.mmabettingblog.com/2008/1...pacquiao-odds/

yes because i meant 100% of boxing fans bet against pacquiao. you're so ****ty to talk to tbh.

most boxing experts picked oscar. most guys who followed boxing picked oscar. that doesn't mean all did.



those odds are a week before the fight btw.

it opened up higher than that. i think it opened up around -190/-200 for oscar.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

pacquiao hasnt fought any cambodians either...coward

[MANGLER]

Why bring this old racial **** back up?

[Bhopreign]

yes because i meant 100% of boxing fans bet against pacquiao. you're so ****ty to talk to tbh.

most boxing experts picked oscar. most guys who followed boxing picked oscar. that doesn't mean all did.



those odds are a week before the fight btw.

it opened up higher than that. i think it opened up around -190/-200 for oscar.

If it opened up at -190 do you realize that the oddsmaker who came up with that -190 feels that the fight isnt a given. What about that dont you understand. This number implies that if they fought 3 times Pacquiao would win once, not a given by any circumstance.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Why bring this old racial **** back up?

because someone who's biggest name on his resume is juan diaz, is begging for a payday

[WhoreUs]

If it opened up at -190 do you realize that the oddsmaker who came up with that -190 feels that the fight isnt a given. What about that dont you understand. This number implies that if they fought 3 times Pacquiao would win once, not a given by any circumstance.

whatever.

no interest in talking to you anymore.

pacquiao was the underdog and most boxing experts gave him little chance to win.

i'm done.