This fight will be another Wlad-Byrd type of affair.
Eddy Chambers WILL beat Wladdy.
Collapse
-
-
Now you are being silly.. they both have the same talent pool to chose from for opponents.. So are you saying if a Wald beats a Top 10 ranked heavy .. he beat a bum.. But if Chambers does.. he is the man..
All of Wlad's opponents are soft.. but when chambers Fights the same man.. (Sam Peter) he is suddenly made of iron and steel??Comment
-
Not true. Chambers is up and coming. He was too young to fight the same guys. Dimitrenko however is better than anyone Wladdy's ever faced. Unless you can conjure up a marquee name on Wladdy's resume.Now you are being silly.. they both have the same talent pool to chose from for opponents.. So are you saying if a Wald beats a Top 10 ranked heavy .. he beat a bum.. But if Chambers does.. he is the man..
All of Wlad's opponents are soft.. but when chambers Fights the same man.. (Sam Peter) he is suddenly made of iron and steel??Comment
-
Really? using your logic.. what are you basing Dimitrenkos prowess on??
He has beaten who again??
By you logic.. If Dimitrenko was better than anyone on Wlad's resume.. than he would have had to have beaten someone who compares to someone on Wlad's resume.. which he hasn't.. NOT EVEN close..
So to say he is better than anyone is wishful thinking bordering on absurdity ...
The Dimitrenko I saw tonight .. wouldn't make the 4th round against Wlad..Comment
-
You can pontificate all you want. You still didn't answer my question. Dimitrenko is as good or better than anyone Klitschko's fought. And I'm not sure Wlad could beat Dimitrenko.Really? using your logic.. what are you basing Dimitrenkos prowess on??
He has beaten who again??
By you logic.. If Dimitrenko was better than anyone on Wlad's resume.. than he would have had to have beaten someone who compares to someone on Wlad's resume.. which he hasn't.. NOT EVEN close..
So to say he is better than anyone is wishful thinking bordering on absurdity ...
The Dimitrenko I saw tonight .. wouldn't make the 4th round against Wlad..
Still waiting on that signature Wladdy win. Go ahead, amuse me.Comment
-
You made the statement.. the burden of proof rests with you my friend..
I answered.. your question is too incomplete to garner anything but more questions and based on a single opinion..
The facts are.. Dimitrenko has fought 1 top 10 ranked heavy.. and lost.. Wlad has fought 21 and beat 19 of them.. with 16 of those being championship fights... It stands to reason.. that Wlad has fought much tougher completion Due to his experience and the experience of his opponents than what a slow Dimitrenko could provide him with..Comment
-
I asked the question before I made any statements. Provide me a marquee name on Wlads resume.You made the statement.. the burden of proof rests with you my friend..
I answered.. your question is too incomplete to garner anything but more questions and based on a single opinion..
The facts are.. Dimitrenko has fought 1 top 10 ranked heavy.. and lost.. Wlad has fought 21 and beat 19 of them.. with 16 of those being championship fights... It stands to reason.. that Wlad has fought much tougher completion Due to his experience and the experience of his opponents than what a slow Dimitrenko could provide him with..
You cant because he has none. The contenders you speak of are names like Tim Austin, Ibragimov, Brewster, Thompson...I mean a pathetic list no matter what number is ascribed to them in the rankings.
Dimitrenko is just as good or better than any of those names.
Sorry, you have no argument.Comment
-
My argument is that Wlad Holds 2 major belts and the Ring belt and Dimitrenko holds nothing..I asked the question before I made any statements. Provide me a marquee name on Wlads resume.
You cant because he has none. The contenders you speak of are names like Tim Austin, Ibragimov, Brewster, Thompson...I mean a pathetic list no matter what number is ascribed to them in the rankings.
Dimitrenko is just as good or better than any of those names.
Sorry, you have no argument.
thus you are telling me the proven man is the one who has to prove something.. Not the unproven man.. which makes no sense..
facts are greater than your opinion.. which means you have no argument ..except your pride.Comment
-
I don't have a dog in the fight. You do. So its your pride and bias at stake here.My argument is that Wlad Holds 2 major belts and the Ring belt and Dimitrenko holds nothing..
thus you are telling me the proven man is the one who has to prove something.. Not the unproven man.. which makes no sense..
facts are greater than your opinion.. which means you have no argument ..except your pride.
Having a title in the HW division isn't exactly a lofty standard these days.
Its a weak division with an even weaker champion. Thats the truth.
So yes. Even a fighter as above average as Chambers can beat a hollow paper champion like Wladdy.Comment
Comment