Why Corrales got so many credits in the first but not Castillo in the second?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JACK D. RIPPER
    Banned
    • May 2009
    • 5156
    • 237
    • 91
    • 5,854

    #11
    Originally posted by Hard2kill
    Corrales used so many dramas in the first fight and won while he was totally dominated in the second...

    Why is he getting too much credit for beating Castillo, while Castillo didn't took same credit when he stopped Corrales in the second fight?
    Its cuz' he came in a few pounds over. I don't think its that big of a deal myself. He should have won the first fight so the second fights outcome didn't surprise me.
    No offense to Chico, who is one of my favorites RIP, but I always thought Castillo was the better all around fighter.

    Comment

    • Cereal
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 813
      • 56
      • 204
      • 7,382

      #12
      + the first was a truly legendary war. The first fight in a series tends to bear the most significance.

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #13
        Originally posted by Hard2kill
        Corrales used so many dramas in the first fight and won while he was totally dominated in the second...

        Why is he getting too much credit for beating Castillo, while Castillo didn't took same credit when he stopped Corrales in the second fight?
        Ive wondered this too but Castillo didnt make weight in the second fight, still with a different ref Corrales would have probably been dq'ed for his antics in the first fight.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP