Firetest for Paquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 787_PR
    Banned
    • Jun 2009
    • 375
    • 9
    • 0
    • 445

    #11
    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
    You're expecting too much. Pacquiao is clearly the best under 147. You can't expect him to be "the best" bar none above his natural weight. He is not a Welterweight, so expecting him to be the best fighting against Welterweights is unrealistic.
    so right there ur saying hes going to lose vs cotto basically

    Comment

    • S A M U R A I
      Bulletproof
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 181694
      • 1,495
      • 1,324
      • 1,419,318

      #12
      Originally posted by 787_PR
      so right there ur saying hes going to lose vs cotto basically
      Nope. I got a bet on Pacquiao winning. What I'm saying is exactly what it says: you can't expect Pacquiao to be the best at 147 because he is still pretty much unproven. Pacquiao is clearly the best below 140, though. If he does beat Cotto (and I think he will), then we can start to discuss Manny at 147 and how good he actually is in this weight division.

      Basically, the thread starter is saying Pacquiao isn't the best -- period - unless he beats Cotto.



      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP