since when did pacman become the 2nd comin of whitaker?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nelsoncm
    i'm proud to be gay
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 1846
    • 54
    • 0
    • 9,819

    #31
    Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT
    Whitaker fought prime fighters at there weight class
    If you were in his era, you'd prolly say Whitaker fought average, overrated, over-the-hill fighters.

    Comment

    • baracuda
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 10779
      • 259
      • 569
      • 11,470

      #32
      Originally posted by Deja_Vous
      Wittaker won a title at 154..

      Let's see Fanny Pac try that...talk about ouchy.
      pac is 6 div champ

      sweetpea is 4div champ.......do you know basic math dumb dumb....

      Comment

      • baracuda
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 10779
        • 259
        • 569
        • 11,470

        #33
        Originally posted by Home town hero
        yes. Expand on your point. Just because roy was an amatuer doesnt detract from the fact that at pretty much the same age roy was fighting 80lbs below his highest weight and pac is only fighting 40 above.
        amateurs use protective gears ...pac was a pro at 16...come on ...if you dont see it idont know what to tell you....

        Comment

        • Home town hero
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 556
          • 42
          • 23
          • 6,914

          #34
          amateurs use protective gears ...pac was a pro at 16...come on ...if you dont see it idont know what to tell you
          pac was pro at 16 because he had to feed his family. Please explain to me why pac is so great because he started at 106? All fighters at 16 are at least 30lbs lighter than they end up i was proving that with the rjj example while you have failed to give me one reason why it makes pac better than every1 else.

          Comment

          • MANGLER
            Sex Tape Flop Artist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 30142
            • 1,705
            • 2,355
            • 46,598

            #35
            Pac has improved his defense, but nobody that I noticed called him a gr8 defensive fighter.

            Comment

            • baracuda
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 10779
              • 259
              • 569
              • 11,470

              #36
              Originally posted by Home town hero
              pac was pro at 16 because he had to feed his family. Please explain to me why pac is so great because he started at 106? All fighters at 16 are at least 30lbs lighter than they end up i was proving that with the rjj example while you have failed to give me one reason why it makes pac better than every1 else.
              why pa's so great?....i thought its a common knowledge...

              the only one who is 4 div lineal champ
              one of the only two who's a 6 div champ
              started at 106 as a pro at the age 16 and now is fighting for a belt at ww catchweight......could you tell me any fighter who's done that or close to doing that in the last 15 years?

              Comment

              • nujabes77
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 8359
                • 535
                • 354
                • 16,443

                #37
                Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT
                Well since you never actually seen sweet pea fight and barely watched boxing a year ago your opinion means ****. Imo i never seen pernell lose in his prime. The ramirez,oscar and draw with chavez were bull**** his last 2 fights he was passed his prime. Manny's resume doesn't stack up to pernells.

                ahahahah you ***n hypocrite, you dont even know half the **** that is coming from your mouth

                whitaker is good but anyone can look good againts bums, when he actually fought competition, he lost them. guy is good but too many people here overrate him


                and i was a casual fan when i was younger, became an avid fan couple years back... and yea my opinion does mean **** otherwise you wouldn't be replying, again ***n hypocrite

                Comment

                • nujabes77
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 8359
                  • 535
                  • 354
                  • 16,443

                  #38
                  Originally posted by mangler
                  Pac has improved his defense, but nobody that I noticed called him a gr8 defensive fighter.

                  hes very underated when it comes to defense... 'new' pac is probably the one of best defensive fighters of all time

                  Comment

                  • nujabes77
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 8359
                    • 535
                    • 354
                    • 16,443

                    #39
                    Originally posted by nelsoncm
                    If you were in his era, you'd prolly say Whitaker fought average, overrated, over-the-hill fighters.


                    which he did and lost his big fights...

                    Comment

                    • Aracibo04
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 1697
                      • 63
                      • 220
                      • 8,538

                      #40
                      hahaha the 'new' pac... haha ahhh pac has fought his share of bums too..

                      i think all good boxers have bums in their resumes...

                      I consider diaz and hatton bums DLH i don't know what happen to him but for those 3 fights I bet manny would win. so...

                      anyway the guy is not comparing pernel to pac... he is just saying that in his opinion too much has been made of pac since his last three fights where he has been untested. as in hit hard and consistently.. does pac have something to do with that Of course!!! but did the quality of his oponents have somethign to do with that again Of course.. pac got hit plenty when he fight in he lower weights..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP