prime george foreman versus prime vitali

[hemichromis]

Let me also add that Foreman (median fightweight in the 70ies: 217lbs) nearly always outweighted his opponents:

Foreman in his 81 fights had only 8 fights against heavier opponents. 7 of these 8 opponents were bums (like featherfist Chuck Wepner, 35-14). The only non-bum was tiny Frazier (outweighted Foreman by 0.5lbs).

Thus it's a complete questionmark how Foreman would fare against heavier better opponents.

there were no toned fighters at klits weight in the 70's i see klits height and reach being a bigger obstacle than his weight. still i see foreman KO by 5 starting with big body punishment. klit would certainly land a few nice punches but they would become less frequen as he tries to block foremans body blows.

[knn]

ur obviously an idiot. the Klits wouldn't be **** in the 70's. The 70's Heavyweights are the GOLDEN age for a reason.

Yeah, the reason is called HYPE + No-Eastern-Competition. Read my sig.

Vitali would be the biggest guy in the scene, but that doesn't mean **** in the heavyweight division.

Hahaha. Just the weight and height difference ALONE gives Vitali Klitschko already a 3:1 advantage.

If a prime Foreman would hit him like that, then his face would have came off.

I am not interested in your favorite delusions.

All 70's Heavies have way more Heart then the Klits. And plus little brother has NO CHIN at all.

A hater's comment.

Moreover this thread is about Prime Vitali. Are you sure you are still ontopic?

Why am I not astonished that you counter facts with your favorite fantasies (like "70ies had more heart" or "Hey, t'was the golden age"). Yawn.