prime george foreman versus prime vitali

[RAESAAD]

LOL....This is just silly. Yes the Klits are the baddest HW around right now but neither stood a chance in hell against a Prime George.....Or even a prime, in shape Lennox Lewis for that matter......(figured I'd ruffle a few feathers)

[F l i c k e r]

Vitali wins.






















I feel like being a Klitschko nuthugger today.

[AKATheMack]

I like Big Vit, but son of a ***** young Foreman was a beast. I dont think George beats 100% of the time but I think he hits hard enough to crack Vits iron chin more often than not.And George aint no damn Danny Williams.

[knn]

o ok..you call joe frazier a bum?..you call ken norton a bum?..

I never ever called Frazier a bum. I never ever called Norton a bum. Don't invent stuff...

I use up already enough time to counter-fact deluded 70ies fans. I don't have time to answer your fabulations about my posts.

and even at the end of his career when he was in his mid forties..he knocked out michael moorer and you call moorer a bum?...

I didn't even analyze Foreman II's career, and I never ever called Moorer a bum. This thread is about PRIME Foreman (70ies), thus you not only invent stuff, but you are also offtopic.

I wonder whether a poster like you would give me Bad Karma? Yup, sure enough... tyman23 gave me Bad Karma. So predictable.

here dulusional..

Cannot read, cannot write, gives Bad Karma... Are these side effects or causes of 70ies-delusion?

[mickey malone]

This is a question rarely asked..
I don't think I've seen such an imaginative post in a long time...

Foreman by KO... Yawn, yawn.......

[KILLA RIGHT]

2 guys that don't move much so it will come down to power and do i really need to say who would win?

[knn]

I could have taken your post as credible until you compared George Foreman to Danny Williams.

1. You wouldn't have taken my post as credible anyway
2. I didn't compare Williams to Foreman. I just compared the possible end result = Foreman flying left and right
3. By your reasoning I also compared Vitali Klitschko to featherfist Jimmy Young (who KDed Foreman). I wonder why you didn't complain about that...

[knn]

Let me also add that Foreman (median fightweight in the 70ies: 217lbs) nearly always outweighted his opponents:

Foreman in his 81 fights had only 8 fights against heavier-than-himself opponents. 7 of these 8 opponents were bums (like featherfist Chuck Wepner, 35-14). The only non-bum was tiny Frazier (outweighted Foreman by 0.5lbs).

Thus it's a complete questionmark how Foreman would fare against better heavier opponents.

[dde91]

I _am_ neutral, but I will defend nowadays heavies. And the Klitschkos happen to be the top heavies nowadays (= they are under the most vicious and deluded attacks). If this would be the 90ies then I would counter deluded fans who claim that "Foreman scores an easy KO against Lennox".

There is NOTHING in Foreman's career that hints at an easy KO against Vitali.

NOTHING, except if you compare Vitali with half-blind dwarfs (Frazier, 5'11'') or green cruisers (Dullaire, 185 lbs, 6-1) or featherfists (Levi Forte) or bums (Goodwin, 1-15).

There is not a single guy whom Foreman I has beaten that is comparable to Vitali:

• Ken Norton was 212lbs (lighter than Chris Byrd)
• Frazier was 5'11'' and half-blind (no wonder he didn't see the clubs coming)
• Kirkman was 203lbs
• Chuvalo was 6'0'' and 214
• Ron Lyle has only a 50%+ KOratio (against heavies).

THESE ARE THE GUYS YOU BASE YOUR OPINION ON? You gotta be kidding me.

205 lbs is the median KO-victim of Foreman I. You should know such facts before you fantasize about an easy win for Foreman. Wake up, the 70ies are over! Vitali would not shrink in the time machine.

Let me also repeat what I have already written: David Haye (6'3'') has approx. the same record as Foreman I
**
see http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5529842
))
and is approx. as tall as Foreman (6'3.5''). We will see what happens when Haye clashes with either Klitschko. You should give Foreman as much chances (based on Foreman's and Haye's records) as you give David Haye.

I give Foreman a chance because I consider Foreman the best of the 70ies. But the chance is less than 25%. Maybe it would look something like Vitali vs Danny Williams, except that Danny Williams was 25lbs heavier than Foreman I. You could see Foreman flying to the left and right as soon as Vitali connects with shots Foreman has never felt before.

Foreman would have equally low chances against Wladimir Klitschko as I wrote at
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh....php?p=5570265

ur obviously an idiot. the Klits wouldn't be **** in the 70's. The 70's Heavyweights are the GOLDEN age for a reason. Vitali would be the biggest guy in the scene, but that doesn't mean **** in the heavyweight division. Who has Vitali beat that makes him a threat to any ATG heavyweight???? He lost to a past prime, fat, careless Lennox Lewis for Crying out loud. If a prime Foreman would hit him like that, then his face would have came off. All 70's Heavies have way more Heart then the Klits. And plus little brother has NO CHIN at all. No chin in the 70's = KTFO

[amir khan]

foreman to grind him down then close the show in brutal fashion