Cotto or Trinidad, who packed a bigger punch?

[WhoreUs]

IMO Trinidad had a bigger punch but Cotto will destroy you with the acomulation of punches, Both very even if you ask me, Tito better head hunter, Cotto to the body..

cotto ain't on tito's level.

in anything.

period.

[Thread Stealer]

Trinidad.

He could change the course of the fight with one punch, and did it against bigger fighters as well.

[Tyson2k7]

Tito is better than Cotto in every single way.

[K-Yo]

Should Boxingscene posters start to be drug tested? It will decrease the number of ridiculous threads, Malignaggi was a big puncher then Julian Jackson, Thank You

[F-22 Raptor]

anyone had coney island hotdogs?

there the ****!! best hotdogs ive ever had

i've never had any i've heard their the ****

[ANDROID_DOES]

The better puncher? No doubt.

But not the better fighter.

Overall Cotto beats Tito in that department.

Tito got outclassed everytime he was ever in against a guy with actual boxing talent (Oscar, Bernard, Winky, even Roy).

Cotto has his own share of flaws but he's able to mix his style up well enough that he can hang just as easily with a volume worker like Margarito (I know he didn't win, but he lasted long past the point where most other guys would've been out) or Clottey, as he can with a solid boxer like Gomez or Quintana, and he can box/punch with boxer/punchers like Mosley as well.

ummm other than oscar tito lost those fights due to size not skill.

[slicksouthpaw16]

Tito, easily. Cotto IMO is a hard puncher but more of an accumulation puncher. Tito had the kind of power that could slip through a tight guard( at his natural weight class) and it only took one punch for him to change the fight around. Hes one of the best punchers Ive seen.