Greatest Prediction of all time

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 521
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #81
    Originally posted by reedickyaluss
    There CAN BE a first time for everything.

    Somethings do NOT have a first.
    It all depends on what the definition of is is

    Comment

    • -MAKAVELLI-
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 50080
      • 3,580
      • 2,792
      • 169,000

      #82
      geezus....here we go again

      Comment

      • -Mustang-
        El Chapo Guzman
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 4224
        • 608
        • 520
        • 14,669

        #83
        i'm glad ИATAS206 made this thread, 5* b!ach is one of the worst posters on NSB

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 521
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #84
          Originally posted by Makavelli
          geezus....here we go again
          We are only at page 9, I got to get it over 10 almost to 11.

          Comment

          • THE REED
            Sixty Forty
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 43489
            • 1,992
            • 1,483
            • 690,068,075

            #85
            Originally posted by The Gambler1981
            It all depends on what the definition of is is
            If you have common sense, you will realize you are now just debating to debate.

            What the definition of IS, is?

            I mean really?


            There IS a cup of coffee

            There is an end to this movie

            There is a light bulb


            These are sentences with definitives.


            There IS a first time for everything.

            No, there IS not.

            Comment

            • -MAKAVELLI-
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 50080
              • 3,580
              • 2,792
              • 169,000

              #86
              reed vs gambler 2 is like dawson-tarver 2...i dont need to see it again

              Comment

              • The Gambler1981
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 25961
                • 521
                • 774
                • 49,039

                #87
                Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                If you have common sense, you will realize you are now just debating to debate.

                What the definition of IS, is?

                I mean really?


                There IS a cup of coffee

                There is an end to this movie

                There is a light bulb


                These are sentences with definitives.


                There IS a first time for everything.

                No, there IS not.
                Do you know who that line comes from?

                Is can be both you are correct it can be taken as a definitive, but it can also mean possibility. Is is a very versitile word, it is like the Sugar Ray Robinson of words, it can do a little bit of everything.

                Comment

                • THE REED
                  Sixty Forty
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 43489
                  • 1,992
                  • 1,483
                  • 690,068,075

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Makavelli
                  reed vs gambler 2 is like dawson-tarver 2...i dont need to see it again
                  Touche`//////////////

                  Comment

                  • The Gambler1981
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 25961
                    • 521
                    • 774
                    • 49,039

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Makavelli
                    reed vs gambler 2 is like dawson-tarver 2...i dont need to see it again
                    It isn't bad but I would rather not have this argument again .

                    Comment

                    • Vasyl’s dad
                      He said no rematch
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 23510
                      • 1,120
                      • 1,945
                      • 50,072

                      #90
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      I know that, I figured that out back on my first arguments on here with the great Boxing_Prospect. I have a way of bugging the **** out of people and I will not give up. I have to want to talk about the topic though, or someone has to get on my nerves.

                      I can get in 10+ page debates like nothing. I don't even have to believe what I am talking about fully, I love playing devil's advocate.

                      I also hate seeing people ganged up on aswell, which plays a role in what I argue about.
                      Trolling.

                      Nice.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP