What number one p4p should be.

[Walt Liquor]

P4P is based on who would win the most if everybody was the same size. I don't mind Pac as #1 atm, but cats make too big a deal of p4p imo.

agreed 1000%, especially with the making too big of a deal.

I prefer people who rule their division and fight every threat, every style, and for every belt. Ala BHop's MW reign (no I don't want to argue the particulares). Roy coulda been the same way i he ever fought Daruisz.

Too bad it rarely happens nowadays. The Klits are trying but their division just sucks.

[nujabes77]

it should not be measured by wins an resume, it should be measured by skill and style,

i was looking at p4p #1's list in the past years, at one point they had JCC, now i LOVE chavez fights, he's one of the most entertaining boxers in history, but skillwish, he isnt that great, he's just great at the one thing he does, come forward.

some were saying if froch gets some more wins, he can be in the top 10, i dont think that would be right, he's a one dimensinal fighter, id put taylor ahead of him p4p, becuz taylor has more SKILLS.

im not saying that Pac shouldent be p4p, but p4p shouldent be made becuse of resume and wins, it should be judged on SKILLS,

****, B-hop has far more skills then manny, b-hop can fight in every style, but watever, i hope you guys understand my thread

and again this is my oppion, we can debate, thats why theres a forum,
i dont want any "**** off loser" in my thread, it only an oppinion.

bhop has more skill than manny? gtfo clown


manny p4p is the most skilled and talented boxer alive today... why do you think he is rank number 1? it's not random, the ring actually pick who is the most skilled and most talented as p4pking...


bhop lost to taylor twice and joe calzaghe... is he is all that, why then?

[nujabes77]

P4P is based on who would win the most if everybody was the same size. I don't mind Pac as #1 atm, but cats make too big a deal of p4p imo.

that means how you rank in the world as a boxer... non of the divisions, organization, association crap


all boxers dream to be the ebst in the world... if you are p4p1, you are the best in the world, the universe

[nujabes77]

how can not it be a big deal? being the best p4p in the world not a big deal, really?

[Roger Mellie]

You were wrong in the first sentence of your post.

It should be by resume and victories. You can have the style or the Skills, but if you havent prove them, then they are worthless!!!!!!

You are both wrong. P4P has and always will mean the same thing, and that's a fictional assertion of who would win a match between 2 fighters if size was taken out of the equation thus giving a level playing field(based on size alone).

It has never been anything other than it is, and is made a big deal because of peoples current obsession with it.

They shouldnt have ****** things like a top ten P4P anyway! there should just be the top dog and thats it.

Its all subjective and has no basis in reality.